Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit:
How does this fit with the changes that have been done to the 1.4.0cvs
user guide? What is the plan for merging later?
I'll make a diff between the current documentation and the documentation
of 1.4 to merge the differences into my new version. So I promise that
noth
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Hello LyXers, after a lot of work, I have the heart to publish a
Uwe> development snapshot.
Hello Uwe,
Uwe> I added many informations about topics discussed in the lyx-users
Uwe> list, like image formats, fonts in pdf etc. (The documenta
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> So it shouldn't be problematic to put the documentation under the GFDL
> if we want that.
But, and this is a big but, any licence change requires the agreement of
all "major" contributers. So, if you want to change the docs licence to
the GFDL, then you'll have to start contacti
Helge Hafting wrote:
If you wonder what licence to use - read both and see what suits you best.
They are only a few pages.
Yes only a few pages but with complicated lawyer sentences.
Angus points me to this link
http://jan.netcomp.monash.edu.au/opendoc/paper.html
where all license types are explain
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 06:36:03PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> >>http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
> >
> >This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation License
> >version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as discussed on the
> >
On Sun, 15 May 2005, [UTF-8] Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation License
version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as discussed on the
list months ago). When was this changed?
Jeremy C.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>>>http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
>>
>> This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation
>> License version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as
>> discussed on the list months ago). When was this changed?
>
> I didn't know about the
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation License
version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as discussed on the
list months ago). When was this changed?
I didn't know about the license of the d
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2005, [UTF-8] Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
>> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
>
> This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation License
> version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as discussed on the
> list months ago).
On 5/16/05 1:36 AM, "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob Bearman wrote:
>>> p.s. Angus, I noticed, that you added some patches to compile LyX with
>>> MSVC. Could you post an instruction for the compilation of LyX 1.4CVS
>>> with MSVC.
>>
>> Instructions for compiling with Visual Stud
Rob Bearman wrote:
>> p.s. Angus, I noticed, that you added some patches to compile LyX with
>> MSVC. Could you post an instruction for the compilation of LyX 1.4CVS
>> with MSVC.
>
> Instructions for compiling with Visual Studio.NET 2003 exist in
> src/development/win32/readme.txt. Building LyX i
On 5/15/05 11:59 AM, "Uwe Stöhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> p.s. Angus, I noticed, that you added some patches to compile LyX with
> MSVC. Could you post an instruction for the compilation of LyX 1.4CVS
> with MSVC.
Instructions for compiling with Visual Studio.NET 2003 exist in
src/development
Hello LyXers,
after a lot of work, I have the heart to publish a development snapshot.
You can find all informations under
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
I added many informations about topics discussed in the lyx-users list,
like image formats, fonts in pdf etc.
(The documentati
13 matches
Mail list logo
