Jose' Matos wrote:
> Yes, it can, but that is not the present behaviour.
> For the present scheme to work you need to create a new file
> lyxconvert_223.py and put there the convertion stuff.
See attached. Works perfectly.
> My question remains, why to change now? Was that intentional?
>
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 17:47, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
> I don't claim to understand the magic that lyx2lyx uses here.
I am asking what is the criterion for the version jump. I elaborate this
bellow.
> Which bit shouldn't be bumped? lyx2lyx or buffer.C?
>
> Why doesn't it
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 June 2003 17:25, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Adds a lyx2lyx conversion routine and;
>> bumps the LyX format to 224.
>
>Do we need this?
>Even if we do it we should do it in a different way, or else lyx2lyx
>will
> not be able to read 223 format documen
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 17:25, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Adds a lyx2lyx conversion routine and;
> bumps the LyX format to 224.
Do we need this?
Even if we do it we should do it in a different way, or else lyx2lyx will
not be able to read 223 format documents.
> Any problems with me applying
This removes the unusable InsetExternal::Params::parameters variable;
Rewrites the InsetExternal read and write methods to in/output the new
format elegantly;
Adds a lyx2lyx conversion routine and;
bumps the LyX format to 224.
Aside to John: my attempts to make an elegant External dialog in Qt ha
