Jose' Matos wrote:
>   Yes, it can, but that is not the present behaviour.
>   For the present scheme to work you need to create a new file
>   lyxconvert_223.py and put there the convertion stuff.

See attached. Works perfectly.

>   My question remains, why to change now?  Was that intentional?
>   Notice that I am not against it, if we decide that this is the way to
>   go, good, you have my vote.

Shrug. It seems to me that we should increment the file format with every 
change. We can always group multiple "development cycle lyxcvonverts" 
together at a release if we are worried about too many files. I see already 
that we don't have a specific lyxconvert_219.py for example.

>> Index: src/buffer.C
>> ===================================================================
>>  namespace {
>>
>> -const int LYX_FORMAT = 223;
>> +const int LYX_FORMAT = 224;
> 
>   No problem here.

Good oh!

Lars, Ok to apply?

-- 
Angus

Attachment: external.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Reply via email to