On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:27:13AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:07:52AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I would also be very happy to go into "testing" mode again. (Sorry,
> >>Martin, I didn't manage to test your branch inset so f
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:07:52AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I would also be very happy to go into "testing" mode again. (Sorry,
Martin, I didn't manage to test your branch inset so far :-( )
I guess you could start now - slowly...
What is your preferred way of c
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:07:52AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I would also be very happy to go into "testing" mode again. (Sorry,
> Martin, I didn't manage to test your branch inset so far :-( )
I guess you could start now - slowly...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:26AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Maybe we should start thinking of a freeze policy for the 1.4 release
which does not lead to deadlocks and half-year-long slumber.
Of course *I* am quiet happy to finally go into slush mode
I would also be very happy to go i
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > What's the performance status ?
> >
> > Performance is really good and I haven't had a crash today...
> Relative to July 1, it still sucks(1). Your machine is too fast.
>
> Garst
>
> (1) Still Unusable 'Cause Keyboard is Slow.
OK, with toda
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 09:56:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Not to mention 110 lost lines of not-so-obvious code and much simpler
> | interface for the lyxrow_func.h stuff (the temporary
> | LyXText::getPar(RowList::iterator) hack is alr
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > What's the performance status ?
>
> Performance is really good and I haven't had a crash today...
Relative to July 1, it still sucks(1). Your machine is too fast.
Garst
(1) Still Unusable 'Cause Keyboard is Slow.
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Not to mention 110 lost lines of not-so-obvious code and much simpler
| interface for the lyxrow_func.h stuff (the temporary
| LyXText::getPar(RowList::iterator) hack is already gone btw)
To me the patch looks pretty good.
--
Lgb
Only known issue is funny behaviour for 'cursor down' on the last line of
a text (jumps to first line...).
Reason is more or less known (the 'correction' in getRowNearY).
In any case, looks like all crashes are gone (especially the multiline
cut), so this is an improvement.
Not to mention 110 l
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:29:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Maybe we should start thinking of a freeze policy for the 1.4 release
> | which does not lead to deadlocks and half-year-long slumber.
>
> Suggestions?
Not yet.
But when it com
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Maybe we should start thinking of a freeze policy for the 1.4 release
| which does not lead to deadlocks and half-year-long slumber.
Suggestions?
--
Lgb
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Pessimist.
Sure am !
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:54:33PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:26AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > There are lots of small things, though. The two phase drawing is still a
> > bit hackish for the main text etc but generally spoken I am more or less
> > happy now.
>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:26AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There are lots of small things, though. The two phase drawing is still a
> bit hackish for the main text etc but generally spoken I am more or less
> happy now.
Really ? So you're basically "done" ? What's the performance status ?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 06:42:47PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > +RowList::iterator getRowNearY(int & y,
> > +ParagraphList::iterator & pit) const;
>
> André, I have been busy at work getting to know the Boost Graph Library.
> Instead of a funct
Just for your information.
Full of crashes and disabled stuff (DEPM), but the 'cut multiple par'
crash is magically gone (as predicted).
Rest should be fixable by everybody (but for some strange reason I have
a strong suspicion that it will be me in the end...)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to g
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> +RowList::iterator getRowNearY(int & y,
> +ParagraphList::iterator & pit) const;
André, I have been busy at work getting to know the Boost Graph Library.
Instead of a function like the one above, it would use something like:
boost::tuple co
17 matches
Mail list logo
