Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
Not in my vi. The previous lines uses a tab for indentation
(as they should) and the 'insertColums' line uses four spaces.
Believe it or not, that _is_ a difference.
Two people
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz a écrit :
> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>+void TocModel::populate(toc::Toc const & toc_list)
> >>+{
> >>+ clear();
> >>+
> >>+ if (toc_list.empty())
> >>+ retu
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz a écrit :
| > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| >> +void TocModel::populate(toc::Toc const & toc_list)
| >> +{
| >> +clear();
| >> +
| >> +if (toc_list.empty())
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz a écrit :
| > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| >> +void TocModel::populate(toc::Toc const & toc_list)
| >> +{
| >> + clear();
| >> +
| >> + if (toc_list.empty())
| >> + return;
| >> +
| >>
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
+void TocModel::populate(toc::Toc const & toc_list)
+{
+ clear();
+
+ if (toc_list.empty())
+ return;
+
+ int current_row;
+ QModelIndex top_level_item;
+
+ toc:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> +void TocModel::populate(toc::Toc const & toc_list)
> +{
> + clear();
> +
> + if (toc_list.empty())
> + return;
> +
> + int current_row;
> + QModelIndex top_level_item;
> +
> + toc::Toc::const_itera
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 10:52:45AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > I would also suggest you using ddd as comfortable GUI interface to
> > gdb. You also need installing X11 for using ddd, though.
>
> The command line is enough for now (I don't have X11). I'll try
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Any opinion against me committing this?
As there doesn't seem to be any and the current state is already better
than before the model/view split, I am going to commit it.
I'd say so, too.
done.
Abdel.
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:57 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
...
Side question about outline for Martin:
The outline function takes no argument.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Any opinion against me committing this?
>
> As there doesn't seem to be any and the current state is already better
> than before the model/view split, I am going to commit it.
I'd say so, too.
Jürgen
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
For the rest, here is a status:
- slider depth: not yet implemented
- navigating: only with mouse-click for now, the connection to the
selectionModel doesn't work...
solved by reconnecting the selectionModel at each update.
- outline: s
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:57 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer a écrit :
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> Side question about outline for Martin:
> >>
> >> The outline function takes no argu
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
...
Side question about outline for Martin:
The outline function takes no argument. It moves or transforms the
section where the cursor is. I think it should instead tak
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 05:44:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Now
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
...
> Side question about outline for Martin:
>
> The outline function takes no argument. It moves or transforms the
> section where the cursor is. I think it should instead take a pit or a
> uid
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Please
don't wait too much time on this as you motivated me to do the mode/view
separation (see attached) ;-)
Nice, but please don't tell me that you removed the slider now.
Not in the GUI but it is not impl
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Thanks. That's great.
You're welcome. But are you sure you don't want two arrow buttons instead?
A QSpinBox? Personally, I find the slider more convenient for this given task.
OK then. But I'll try to enlarge the slider button a bit to
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Thanks. That's great.
>
> You're welcome. But are you sure you don't want two arrow buttons instead?
A QSpinBox? Personally, I find the slider more convenient for this given task.
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
No need to apologize. It's not the time I spent. I just find the slider
useful, so I think it should not just disappear.
I'll make sure it comes back then.
Thanks. That's great.
You're welcome. But are you sure you don't want two arrow
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C
| ===
| --- src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C (revision 13687)
| +++ src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C (working copy)
| -void QToc::build_
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C
| ===
| --- src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C (revision 13687)
| +++ src/frontends/qt4/QToc.C (working copy)
| -void QToc::build_dialog()
| +bool QToc::canOutlin
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > No need to apologize. It's not the time I spent. I just find the slider
> > useful, so I think it should not just disappear.
>
> I'll make sure it comes back then.
Thanks. That's great.
> > I'm sorry, qt4 is a completely new universe to me. And I'm running a bit
> > o
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I am very sorry Juergen that you spend some times to fix the slider bug.
But rest assure that it was not for nothing because now I know the
correct logic ;-).
No need to apologize. It's not the time I spent. I just find the slider
useful
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I am very sorry Juergen that you spend some times to fix the slider bug.
> But rest assure that it was not for nothing because now I know the
> correct logic ;-).
No need to apologize. It's not the time I spent. I just find the slider
useful, so I think it should not ju
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Please
don't wait too much time on this as you motivated me to do the mode/view
separation (see attached) ;-)
Nice, but please don't tell me that you removed the slider now.
Not in the GUI but it is not impl
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Please
don't wait too much time on this as you motivated me to do the mode/view
separation (see attached) ;-)
Nice, but please don't tell me that you removed the slider now.
Not in the GUI but it is not implemented yet (but should be ea
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Please
> don't wait too much time on this as you motivated me to do the mode/view
> separation (see attached) ;-)
Nice, but please don't tell me that you removed the slider now.
Jürgen
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 05:44:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > >
> > >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Now
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 05:44:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >
> >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Now the most severe bug is the crash on moving entries up/down.
> >>> It should not b
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Now the most severe bug is the crash on moving entries up/down.
It should not be difficult, it used to work at one point but not
anymore. I can't fix it because it make g
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > > Now the most severe bug is the crash on moving entries up/down.
> >
> > It should not be difficult, it used to work at one point but not
> > anymore. I can't fix it because it make gdb crash unde
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
I'll see to it, thanks. I think this is because the tree is updated
before the signal is received so current is not valid anymore. Please
don't wait too much time on this as you motivated me to do the mode/view
don't _waste_ too much time...
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Now the most severe bug is the crash on moving entries up/down.
It should not be difficult, it used to work at one point but not
anymore. I can't fix it because it make gdb crash under windows. But if
you can post a backtrace of the crash,
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Now the most severe bug is the crash on moving entries up/down.
>
> It should not be difficult, it used to work at one point but not
> anymore. I can't fix it because it make gdb crash under windows. But if
> you can post a backtrace of the crash, I might have some idea
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
As a side note, I don't like this slider so I didn't bother fixing it.
IMHO it is not very useful as it is. I would prefer two up and down
little arrows with an edit box indicating the depth. But even that is
IMHO not very useful.
I'll co
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> As a side note, I don't like this slider so I didn't bother fixing it.
> IMHO it is not very useful as it is. I would prefer two up and down
> little arrows with an edit box indicating the depth. But even that is
> IMHO not very useful.
I'll commit the attached fix short
Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Abdel,
I'm putting the attached patch in. It just uses a proper grid layout for the
dialog, nothing more.
Fine.
I guess you are aware that the slider thing does not work yet.
Yes, feel free to fix some other bugs ;-)
As a side note, I don't like this slider s
Abdel,
I'm putting the attached patch in. It just uses a proper grid layout for the
dialog, nothing more.
I guess you are aware that the slider thing does not work yet.
Jürgen
Index: src/frontends/qt4/ui/QTocUi.ui
===
--- src/fronten
38 matches
Mail list logo
