Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:57 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
...
Side question about outline for Martin:
The outline function takes no argument. It moves or transforms the
section where the cursor is. I think it should instead take a pit or a
uid so that we can use the outline feature without having any cursor.
What do you think?
Why would you want to do that? I could imagine moving multiple headers
(instead of just one),
For example yes. That's one reason.
but why would you want to change the doc in a
place where your current cursor is not located?
Because, IMHO, there is no logical link between the cursor position and
the document structure, those two are simply independent. I can well
imagine a full outline mode completely disconnected from the buffer view.
But what does it buy you?
For one, the controller could return the updated TocItem so that I don't
need to look for it. So taking a TocItem as an argument in ControlToc is
a good idea actually:
+ void ControlToc::outline(toc::OutlineOp op)
- bool ControlToc::outline(toc::OutlineOp op, TocItem & toc_item)
This method would also return false if the operation is not possible and
true otherwise (try to click many times in the IN button of the qt2
frontend).
Abdel.
