Am Sonntag, 18. Februar 2007 16:58 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> It was reg1 previously, I renamed it to reg6 because it has been moved to
the
> end of the list. Almost all regexes are just numbered (but I have added
lots
> of comments everywhere, so this should be clear).
>
> I really don't
José Matos wrote:
> I am happy that Georg likes the patch, I was surprised to see patch from
> you in a message sent before 7 am on a Sunday. ;-)
I couldn't sleep. Actually, I was awake at 5am :-(
> Please put it in.
Done.
Jürgen
On Sunday 18 February 2007 3:58:49 pm Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Right, I'll put it in then.
I am happy that Georg likes the patch, I was surprised to see patch from you
in a message sent before 7 am on a Sunday. ;-)
Please put it in.
> Jürgen
--
José Abílio
Georg Baum wrote:
> Great! I am not surprised at all that it became complicated, for that
> reason I did not dare to touch this code.
> The only thing that I don't like is the name 'reg6'. Couldn't you come up
> with something better?
It was reg1 previously, I renamed it to reg6 because it has bee
Am Sonntag, 18. Februar 2007 07:52 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> I've further reworked the log file parsing in order to fix dependency
> checking.
>
> Here's what I came up with. It's a good deal more complicated than the
> previous parsing (and more complicated than I wished), however, this
ve
I've further reworked the log file parsing in order to fix dependency
checking.
Here's what I came up with. It's a good deal more complicated than the
previous parsing (and more complicated than I wished), however, this version
fixes all problems I'm aware of, including all sorts of filenames w
