Georg Baum wrote: > Great! I am not surprised at all that it became complicated, for that > reason I did not dare to touch this code. > The only thing that I don't like is the name 'reg6'. Couldn't you come up > with something better?
It was reg1 previously, I renamed it to reg6 because it has been moved to the end of the list. Almost all regexes are just numbered (but I have added lots of comments everywhere, so this should be clear). I really don't have a better idea (feel free to rename the regexes if you do). > > José, can this go in before the beta? > > I'd say put it in. If José complains (which of course he will not do, but > just in case) I would complain that the beta is not released yet :-) Right, I'll put it in then. Jürgen
