Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-18 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >>> and you should have kept the changes in separate patches. >> > | That is a case of "the pot calling the kettle black" if ever I > | heard one. Witness Garst's request for the lyx2lyx temporary file > | patch to be backported to 1.3.x. A 5 line patch wrapped up in a >

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-18 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:16:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes >> | wrote: | Not from me. Too much effort than I can afford right now. Then _why_ did you be

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-18 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:16:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes > | wrote: >>> | Not from me. Too much effort than I can afford right now. >>> >>> Then _why_ did you begin cleanup at all? >> > | The same reason why I star

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:51:23PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > I have about 10 versions, partial trees and messed up patches now. > > > I got this from CVS. Updated, and still there. > > Yes, CVS is broken. > > I'll just commit what seems to be the difference between CVS and old CVS

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 06:58:55PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:36:51PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 06:47:56PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > Simple things... it's the message, not the patch. > > > > Yes, but that's from a pre

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:36:51PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 06:47:56PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Simple things... it's the message, not the patch. > > Yes, but that's from a preliminary version of the patch I did not intend > to apply (even if the fix i

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 06:47:56PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Simple things... it's the message, not the patch. Yes, but that's from a preliminary version of the patch I did not intend to apply (even if the fix is obvious...) Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain S

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:26:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 06:38:36PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Current CVS does not quite... I need the attached. > > Sigh. > > I already complete broke that patch > > Andre' Simple things... it's the message, n

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 06:38:36PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Current CVS does not quite... I need the attached. Sigh. I already complete broke that patch Andre'

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > > Andre' > > PS: Martin: It works. > Current CVS does not quite... I need the attached. - Martin -- Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Helsinki University of Technology Dept. of Surveying, Inst. of Geodesy P.O. Box 12

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:16:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> | Not from me. Too much effort than I can afford right now. >> >> Then _why_ did you begin cleanup at all? > | The same reason why I start cleaning the flat the day before an exam.

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:16:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Not from me. Too much effort than I can afford right now. > > Then _why_ did you begin cleanup at all? The same reason why I start cleaning the flat the day before an exam. I don't want to learn for the exam, so I do somethi

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:04:09PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > is it now possible to have headings without counters in the navigate > > > menu? (like koma's addchaps and addsecs which have no counters but appear > > > in the toc). > > > > > > Would be great. > >

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:30:10PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | The most controversial bit in the patch should be the removal of some > | 'ObsoletedBy' entries. I believe this is the realm of lyx2lyx now for > | the distributed .layouts. [I.e.

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > is it now possible to have headings without counters in the navigate > > menu? (like koma's addchaps and addsecs which have no counters but appear > > in the toc). > > > > Would be great. > > I'd guess so. Simply adding a 'TocDepth 2' or similar to the layout > should do.

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The most controversial bit in the patch should be the removal of some | 'ObsoletedBy' entries. I believe this is the realm of lyx2lyx now for | the distributed .layouts. [I.e. the facility as such should be kept to | enable the user to use it in his priv

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > PS: Martin: It works. :-) - Martin pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:46:09AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > The depth at which a certain layout appears in the Navigate menu is now > > explicitly defined in the .layout file with the new 'TocLevel' tag. > > This method is not only more robust but also more flex

Re: [patch] counters 3

2003-09-15 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Andre Poenitz wrote: > The depth at which a certain layout appears in the Navigate menu is now > explicitly defined in the .layout file with the new 'TocLevel' tag. > This method is not only more robust but also more flexible than the > previously method based on 'educated guessing' (see last chunk