Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:05:39AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:31:05AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
With your patch applied, when I mark as english the footnote content
I correctly see a \sele
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:21:42AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:31:05AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
With your patch applied, when I mark as english the footnote
content I
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:21:42AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Dov Feldstern wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:31:05AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > With your patch applied, when I mark as english the footnote
> > content
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:05:39AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:31:05AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> With your patch applied, when I mark as english the footnote content
> I correctly see a \selectlan
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:31:05AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
With your patch applied, when I mark as english the footnote
content I correctly see a \selectlanguage{english} inserted before
"bla bla bla".
But I also see t
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:31:05AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
With your patch applied, when I mark as english the footnote content
I correctly see a \selectlanguage{english} inserted before "bla bla bla".
But I also see that the whole footnote
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:31:05AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> With your patch applied, when I mark as english the footnote content
> >> I correctly see a \selectlanguage{english} inserted before "bla bla bla".
> >> But I also see that the whole footnote inset is ma
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
With your patch applied, when I mark as english the footnote content
I correctly see a \selectlanguage{english} inserted before "bla bla bla".
But I also see that the whole footnote inset is marked as foreign, so I
select the whole of it and mark it as english. Now it is
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:47:20AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:27:09AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >
> >
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >
>
> > > Writing again "bla bla bla", I got:
> > >
> > > (Point 3a)
> > > bla bla bla \foreignlanguage{italian}{BLA BLA
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:27:09AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
>
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > Writing again "bla bla bla", I got:
> >
> > (Point 3a)
> > bla bla bla \foreignlanguage{italian}{BLA BLA BLA}%
> > \footnote{bla bla bla%
> > }
> >
> > which lacks the \selectlanguage command
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Dov,
Hi Enrico! Thanks for taking a look at this... :)
this is what I did. Without your patch applied, I started a new
document, so the language is english, and then activated "View Source".
I wrote "bla bla bla ", then switched the language to italian and wrote
"BL
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 09:19:15PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> What the patch is trying to fix is the case where a language switch was
> being missed, for example in the following situation:
>
> document language is english
> \lang english
> bla bla bla
> \lang hebrew
> BLA BLA BLA
> \footnote
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
OK, here's my original patch for bug 1820 (without the second part,
identical to what I originally sent in). It solves most cases, as far as
I can determine is safe (I tried it on my documents with complex bidi /
encoding / language transitions), and it
Dov Feldstern wrote:
encoding / language transitions), and it does not constitute a format
change, IMO.
I'm not sure this is true, I think even just this patch is a format
change... anyone care to take a look?
Dov Feldstern wrote:
> OK, here's my original patch for bug 1820 (without the second part,
> identical to what I originally sent in). It solves most cases, as far as
> I can determine is safe (I tried it on my documents with complex bidi /
> encoding / language transitions), and it does not constit
On Thursday 12 July 2007 18:30:16 Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Finally, there's the issue of bug 3613. It is due to some format change
> from long ago which never had an accompanying lyx2lyx made for it (I
> have nothing to do with that... ;) ). If possible, we should fix this
> (i.e., create a lyx2lyx f
OK, here's my original patch for bug 1820 (without the second part,
identical to what I originally sent in). It solves most cases, as far as
I can determine is safe (I tried it on my documents with complex bidi /
encoding / language transitions), and it does not constitute a format
change, IMO.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Dov" == Dov Feldstern
writes:
Dov> Do you know why this whole font-change mechanism was originally
Dov> added?
Consider a footnote with several paragraphs and assume it is typeset
in \emph like this:
\emph{Some text\footnote{and and explanation
on several par
> "Dov" == Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> Do you know why this whole font-change mechanism was originally
Dov> added?
Consider a footnote with several paragraphs and assume it is typeset
in \emph like this:
\emph{Some text\footnote{and and explanation
on several paragraphs}
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
So, to sum up: the patch attached at
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/89376 together with
the patch attached here solve bug 1820 completely.
Index: src/insets/In
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
are attached in bugzilla (though I'm having trouble downloading
attachments from bugzilla, at the moment, anyone know anything about
this?)
Dov
I was able to download the attachments from bugzilla now, and I see
there's one case which still isn't
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Attached find a patch for bug 1820, which has resisted solution for a
long time. After a lot of work done by others to tidy up the
output_latex code in the past few months, the infrastructure was now in
place so that finally we can provide a solution. It would be good
Dov Feldstern wrote:
are attached in bugzilla (though I'm having trouble downloading
attachments from bugzilla, at the moment, anyone know anything about this?)
Dov
I was able to download the attachments from bugzilla now, and I see
there's one case which still isn't solved. I'll try to tak
Hi!
Attached find a patch for bug 1820, which has resisted solution for a
long time. After a lot of work done by others to tidy up the
output_latex code in the past few months, the infrastructure was now in
place so that finally we can provide a solution. It would be good if
this could still
24 matches
Mail list logo
