On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:51:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This was a great idea... result attached. I will commit this
> > presently if I hear no objections.
>
> Good.
It's committed.
- Martin
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This was a great idea... result attached. I will commit this
> presently if I hear no objections.
Good.
JMarc
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:54:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:23:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hmmm, elsewhere in the code I see such constru
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:23:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Hmmm, elsewhere in the code I see such constructs as
>> > CS_LATEXNAME and TC_SOMETHING... we're not the first time
>> > running
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:23:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hmmm, elsewhere in the code I see such constructs as
> > CS_LATEXNAME and TC_SOMETHING... we're not the first time
> > running into this problem.
>
> Very good point :)
So wha
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm, elsewhere in the code I see such constructs as
> CS_LATEXNAME and TC_SOMETHING... we're not the first time
> running into this problem.
Very good point :)
JMarc
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 12:41:06AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> New patch looks better.
>
> >> These things could _maybe_ be moved to insetlayout.
> >
> > Yes... but I'd rather not do that right now, as it would
> > touch some files contain
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
New patch looks better.
>> These things could _maybe_ be moved to insetlayout.
>
> Yes... but I'd rather not do that right now, as it would
> touch some files containing another pending patch.
OK
>> I do not like these InlinedD/InlinedG. Isn't it pos
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 04:05:16PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Attached is a first attempt to streamline the handling of the
> > various presentation modes of collapsable insets.
>
> I think this is something that is very worth doing and t
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached is a first attempt to streamline the handling of the
> various presentation modes of collapsable insets.
I think this is something that is very worth doing and the structure
of the patch is sound.
Some comments on the code follow.
JMarc
>
Attached is a first attempt to streamline the handling of the
various presentation modes of collapsable insets.
To do still:
1) really remove the Inlined value from the CollapseStatus enum
2) same from the ERT dialog
3) move the drawing of "Conglomerate-style" inset presentation
from CharStyle to
11 matches
Mail list logo
