On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 12:41:06AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > New patch looks better. > > >> These things could _maybe_ be moved to insetlayout. > > > > Yes... but I'd rather not do that right now, as it would > > touch some files containing another pending patch. > > OK > > >> I do not like these InlinedD/InlinedG. Isn't it possible to use > >> Decoration::Inlined and Geometry::Inlined? > > > > I tried something like that; not sure you like the result. > > Should I use namespaces instead? > > I do not like it much indeed. > > I do not know what the right solution is. Is there some C++ guru around?
Hmmm, elsewhere in the code I see such constructs as CS_LATEXNAME and TC_SOMETHING... we're not the first time running into this problem. - Martin
