Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So I've solved it in a somewhat ugly way by adding a flag that tells if
| prevrit is pointing to a valid position or else we will need to take
| rows().begin(). Maybe you can rewrite it in a less ugly way...
I am just applying this patch, but I ha
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'll apply it before anyne else finds more errors. :-)
Oops, I had:
a
b
and make a selection that spans the two rows (for instance the last a and
first b) and cut: crash
The problem is that my previous solution for prevrit is not good enough if
for instance
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| True, it undo works with 1) solved.
[...]
| this modified redoParagraphs solves 1) (and the undo) and 2) for me (the
| modified regions are above ^, sorry for not providing a patch
| against your patch, I'm too lazy to cvs up and reapp
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > This patch basically rewrites redoParagraphs to use the
> | > RowList::iterators instead of Row*.
> | >
> | > This is a very important function and quite complex too, so strang
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > This patch basically rewrites redoParagraphs to use the
| > RowList::iterators instead of Row*.
| >
| > This is a very important function and quite complex too, so strange
| > things might arise here.
|
| 1) It cr
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This patch basically rewrites redoParagraphs to use the
> RowList::iterators instead of Row*.
>
> This is a very important function and quite complex too, so strange
> things might arise here.
1) It crashes on cut:
aaa|
select the last 'a' and cut: crash. The b
This patch basically rewrites redoParagraphs to use the
RowList::iterators instead of Row*.
This is a very important function and quite complex too, so strange
things might arise here.
Would be nice if people could test this a bit.
Index: po/POTFILES.in
=
