On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 09:25:07AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > I can confirm it works.
>
> No objections from me, then.
I committed it.
--
Enrico
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I can confirm it works.
No objections from me, then.
Jürgen
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:30:27PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> We are still in the thread that contained at some point of time
>
> > [...]
> 5. It works.
>
> right?
Yes. In particular, it is the same thread where someone confused
a named pipe with a socket.
--
Enrico
Andre Poenitz schreef:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
You don't need Cygwin to test it.
1. Use "\\.\pipe\lyxpipe" (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path
in the preferences.
2. Quit and restart LyX.
3. In a cmd.exe terminal type
echo LYXCM
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>> You don't need Cygwin to test it.
>>>
>>> 1. Use "\\.\pipe\lyxpipe" (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path
>>>in the preferences.
>>> 2. Quit and restart LyX.
>>> 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type
>>> echo LYXCMD:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >
> >> You don't need Cygwin to test it.
> >>
> >> 1. Use "\\.\pipe\lyxpipe" (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path
> >>in the preferences.
> >> 2. Quit and restart LyX.
> >> 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type
> >> e
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:00:52AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Enrico,
> > I would appreciate feedback from Cmake and Scons users as I don't know
> > whether the patches for these build systems (that I incorporated from
> > other commits in trunk) actually work.
> >
> >
> > Index: de
You don't need Cygwin to test it.
1. Use "\\.\pipe\lyxpipe" (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path
in the preferences.
2. Quit and restart LyX.
3. In a cmd.exe terminal type
echo LYXCMD:test:file-open> \\.\pipe\lyxpipe.in
type \\.\pipe\lyxpipe.out
If the file dialog opens,
Enrico,
I would appreciate feedback from Cmake and Scons users as I don't know
whether the patches for these build systems (that I incorporated from
other commits in trunk) actually work.
Index: development/cmake/src/insets/CMakeLists.txt
=
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >No, but I reproduced what they did in trunk, so I interpret
> >the silence as "everything's Ok".
>
> Hmm.. The silence means that I haven't looked at it yet. I just didn't get
> to it and then I probably forgot.
Could you (or someone else) do it? A second p
>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> > > This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well
>> > > tested, I'm not opposed to put this in branch.
>> >
>> > So, Jürgen?
>>
>> Did you get feedback from the SCons and CMake front?
>
>No, but I reproduced what they did in trunk, so I interp
Am Thursday 10 September 2009 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested,
> > > > I'm not opposed to put this in branch.
> > >
> > > So
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested,
> > > I'm not opposed to put this in branch.
> >
> > So, Jürgen?
>
> Did you get feedback from the SCons and CMake front?
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested,
> > I'm not opposed to put this in branch.
>
> So, Jürgen?
Did you get feedback from the SCons and CMake front?
Jürgen
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:10:23PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x.
> > I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very
> > well for me (for some aspects, even better than the server
Andre Poenitz wrote:
What was the system Qt version shipped with the Windows distribution?
4.5.2
Joost
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:24:56PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:38:25AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:50:28PM +, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:24:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Honestly, I was also uneasy about this platform specific code but I
> didn't say anything because 1) you obviously spent quite some work on it
> and 2) nobody else volunteered to implement the feature on Windows
> before you 3)
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:38:25AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:50:28PM +, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > Andre Poenitz writes:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:50:28PM +, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Andre Poenitz writes:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The attached patch imple
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:50:28PM +, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Andre Poenitz writes:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Win
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:50:28PM +, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Andre Poenitz writes:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x.
> >
> > Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ plat
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
>
> > I stress tested it and it works for me, but I have heard nothing from
> > others.
> > Before committing to branch, I would also like to know whether it also
> > works with CMake and Scons, as I use autotools and cannot test.
> >
> >
> I don't have Cygwin, s
Andre Poenitz writes:
>
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x.
>
> Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific
> lines code of our own instead of using, say, QLocalSocket?
Bec
I stress tested it and it works for me, but I have heard nothing from others.
Before committing to branch, I would also like to know whether it also
works with CMake and Scons, as I use autotools and cannot test.
I don't have Cygwin, so I can't test it on Windows.
Vincent
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:10:23PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x.
> > I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very
> > well for me (for some aspects, even better than the serve
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x.
Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific
lines code of our own instead of using, say, QLocalSocket?
Andre'
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x.
> I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very
> well for me (for some aspects, even better than the server as
> implemented for *nix). So, I think that it is ready for prime time
> e
The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x.
I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very
well for me (for some aspects, even better than the server as
implemented for *nix). So, I think that it is ready for prime time
even in branch. Note that if the LyX
29 matches
Mail list logo
