On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 30/01/2013 06:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Can this go in?
>
>
> Sure.
It's in.
Thanks,
Scott
Le 30/01/2013 06:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Can this go in?
Sure.
JMarc
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> ---
> INSTALL | 32
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
> index 7ff59da..7ed8b1b 100644
> --- a/INSTALL
> +++ b/INSTALL
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ These four s
---
INSTALL | 32
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
index 7ff59da..7ed8b1b 100644
--- a/INSTALL
+++ b/INSTALL
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ These four steps will compile, test and install LyX:
(for example, "--with-q
"Roland Clobus" writes:
>> Just a question: is this with MSVC or configure/mingw?
>
> MSVC2008, as recommended in INSTALL.Win32
Not my department, then :)
Thanks.
JMarc
Jeam-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
> "Roland Clobus" writes:
> > I found out that LyX will not build under Windows XP SP3 (Branch
1.6)
> > when the directory for the source contains spaces (I had the sources
> > in C:\Documents and Settings\Myname\LyX)
> Just a question: is this with MSVC or configure
"Roland Clobus" writes:
> Hello,
>
> I've created a small patch to make LyX configure correctly on my
> computer.
>
> I found out that LyX will not build under Windows XP SP3 (Branch 1.6)
> when the directory for the source contains spaces (I had the sources in
> C:\Documents and Settings\Myname\
Roland Clobus wrote:
> > Attached you'll find the unzipped version.
commited, thanks.
pavel
Should have sent the reply to the list.
> -Original Message-
> From: Roland Clobus
> Sent: donderdag 15 januari 2009 14:25
> To: 'sa...@lyx.org'
> Subject: RE: Documentation patch: install the sources in a directory
> without spaces
>
> Pavel Sanda w
Roland Clobus wrote:
> I found out that LyX will not build under Windows XP SP3 (Branch 1.6)
> when the directory for the source contains spaces (I had the sources in
> C:\Documents and Settings\Myname\LyX)
hi!
please can you post your patches unzipped, so we can directly comment on them?
pavel
Hello,
I've created a small patch to make LyX configure correctly on my
computer.
I found out that LyX will not build under Windows XP SP3 (Branch 1.6)
when the directory for the source contains spaces (I had the sources in
C:\Documents and Settings\Myname\LyX)
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Jürgen, OK for branch?
yes.
Jürgen
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:23:00PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:15:49PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Is the attached patch appropriate for the INSTALL file?
>
> Yes.
Committed.
Jürgen, OK for branch?
--
Enrico
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:15:49PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Is the attached patch appropriate for the INSTALL file?
Yes.
Andre'
Is the attached patch appropriate for the INSTALL file?
--
Enrico
Index: INSTALL
===
--- INSTALL (revision 22947)
+++ INSTALL (working copy)
@@ -320,6 +320,47 @@ notify us.
o On SUN Sparc Solaris, you need gnumake. The LyX
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:47:18PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> Go, this is better than nothing and can be completed later.
Apparently it's mega controversial so I'll just leave it to Dekel or
whatever
regards
john
--
"Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 20:10, John Levon wrote:
> This patch installs lyx2lyx into the path,and places the support .py
> into $DATADIR/lyx2lyx
>
> It does NOT fix using non-installed lyx.
I will fix that later, the same way we do for reLyX.
> Any comments ? the only change to the script i
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:59:22AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> For now I don't care about installing I run lyx always from the
> build-dir. I tried your patch and now I get this errors:
That's the same error I get without the patch on File->New.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Here is a patch for searching the lyx2lyx script in LYXDIR.
> I did not change your Makefile patch.
> The new makefile should copy lyx2lyx to LYXDIR/lyx2lyx/
> and perhaps add a symbolic link to PREFIX/bin/
For now I don't care about installing I run lyx always from the
build-
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:56:40AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:32:21AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> > Actually I agree with Andre here. We should just leave it in the lyx-libdir.
>
> Then *you* do the patch
Here is a patch for searching the lyx2lyx script in LYXDIR.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well *I* don't have the time and as *your* patch doesn't fix the problem *I*
> have with lyx2lyx, *I* don't care about *your* patch.
Well OK then !
regards
john
--
"Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the l
John Levon wrote:
>>Actually I agree with Andre here. We should just leave it in the lyx-libdir.
>
> Then *you* do the patch
Well *I* don't have the time and as *your* patch doesn't fix the problem *I*
have with lyx2lyx, *I* don't care about *your* patch.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:32:21AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Actually I agree with Andre here. We should just leave it in the lyx-libdir.
Then *you* do the patch
> This are LyX Helper applications I don't
Nope, read the previous discussion.
regards
john
--
"Take the ideas you find usefu
John Levon wrote:
>>Actually I see no problem in always calling the lib version, and on 'make
>>install' to setup a symlink to /usr/whatever/bin.
>
> It's more hassle and uglier Makefile.am
Actually I agree with Andre here. We should just leave it in the lyx-libdir.
If distributions like it to g
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:54:21AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > See the previous discussions on whether a user may want t ocall lyx2lyx
> > themselves. The consensus was "yes"
>
> Sure. But _then_ he has to make sure to add it to his path himself.
Why bother ?
> Actually I see no problem i
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:06:49AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Why has lyx2lyx be in the path? Couldn't it be called from the libdir
> > directly?
>
> See the previous discussions on whether a user may want t ocall lyx2lyx
> themselves. The consensus was "yes"
Sure. But _then_ he has to make su
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:57:59AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Why has lyx2lyx be in the path? Couldn't it be called from the libdir
> directly?
See the previous discussions on whether a user may want t ocall lyx2lyx
themselves. The consensus was "yes"
regards
john
--
"Take the ideas you fin
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:10:03PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> This patch installs lyx2lyx into the path,and places the support .py
> into $DATADIR/lyx2lyx
>
> It does NOT fix using non-installed lyx.
Why has lyx2lyx be in the path? Couldn't it be called from the libdir
directly?
--
Those who d
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This patch installs lyx2lyx into the path,and places the support .py
| into $DATADIR/lyx2lyx
|
| It does NOT fix using non-installed lyx.
|
| Any comments ? the only change to the script is to import the path of
| the .py files ? If this is OK I will com
This patch installs lyx2lyx into the path,and places the support .py
into $DATADIR/lyx2lyx
It does NOT fix using non-installed lyx.
Any comments ? the only change to the script is to import the path of
the .py files ? If this is OK I will commit it
regards
john
--
"When your name is Winner,
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> The attached mentions
John> the necessary workaround for RH7.0 users doing
John> --with-frontend=kde. Apparently that's how RH built all the
John> KDE/Qt libraries.
This one is in (for both branches)
JMarc
The attached mentions the necessary workaround for RH7.0 users doing
--with-frontend=kde. Apparently that's how RH built all the KDE/Qt libraries.
thanks
john
--
"The HP-UX CC compiler cannot handle two consecutive semicolons. It is a silly
compiler."
- kdeveloper.org
Index: ChangeL
32 matches
Mail list logo
