Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>>
>> As you see, not different at all... except that use of
>> lyx::support::abort will not change if ::abort is put in the std
>> namespace. (or anywhere else...)
>
| The patch below makes CVS compile on my FreeBSD system.
>
|
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
> As you see, not different at all... except that use of
> lyx::support::abort will not change if ::abort is put in the std
> namespace. (or anywhere else...)
The patch below makes CVS compile on my FreeBSD system.
OK?
R.
Index: src/boost.C
===
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Unless you tell me in more detail what your abort-preference
>> | actually implies.
>>
>> the "problem" with using assert is that it depends on defines: NDEBUG
>> in particular.
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Unless you tell me in more detail what your abort-preference
> | actually implies.
>
> the "problem" with using assert is that it depends on defines: NDEBUG
> in particular.
>
> And what we really want anyway is a plain
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Unless you tell me in more detail what your abort-preference
| actually implies.
the "problem" with using assert is that it depends on defines: NDEBUG
in particular.
And what we really want anyway is a plain abort at this point.
So to just abort is just
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>| Should instead a "#include " be added at the top of this file?
>
>Either that or we should use lyx::support::abort instead.
>(I'll probably prefere that.)
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>>
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Should instead a "#include " be added at the top of this file?
Either that or we
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>>>Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>| Should instead a "#include " be added at the top of this file?
>>>
>>>Either that or we should use lyx::support::abort instead.
>>>(I'll p
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>> | Should instead a "#include " be added at the top of this file?
>>
>> Either that or we should use lyx::support::abort instead.
>> (I'll probably prefere that.)
>
| Either way
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> | Should instead a "#include " be added at the top of this file?
>
> Either that or we should use lyx::support::abort instead.
> (I'll probably prefere that.)
Either way.
As it is now, CVS doesn't compile :(.
R.
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Index: src/boost.C
>> | ===
>> | RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/boost.C,v
>> | retrieving revision 1.4
>> | diff
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Index: src/boost.C
> | ===
> | RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/boost.C,v
> | retrieving revision 1.4
> | diff -u -r1.4 boost.C
> | --- src/boost.C 2003/09
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: src/boost.C
| ===
| RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/boost.C,v
| retrieving revision 1.4
| diff -u -r1.4 boost.C
| --- src/boost.C 2003/09/09 17:25:17 1.4
| +++ src/boost.C
Index: src/boost.C
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/boost.C,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 boost.C
--- src/boost.C 2003/09/09 17:25:17 1.4
+++ src/boost.C 2003/09/10 05:06:32
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
lyxerr << "Asse
14 matches
Mail list logo