Re: [patch] CVS: assert() error in src/boost.C

[Rob Lahaye]

Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> | Unless you tell me in more detail what your abort-preference
> | actually implies. 
> 
> the "problem" with using assert is that it depends on defines: NDEBUG
> in particular.
> 
> And what we really want anyway is a plain abort at this point.
> 
> So to just abort is just a way to bypass the outer shell of assert.

OK, fine with me.
But why "lyx::support::abort"? How does that differ from:

        #include <cstdlib>
        [...]
        abort();


For me testing it, should I do something like:

        #include <?what?>
        [...]
        lyx::support::abort();

Rob.