On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:04:57AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > -if test -z "$COMSPEC" && test -z "$ComSpec"; then SEP=':'; else SEP=';';
> > fi +# MS-DOS and MS-Windows define $COMSPEC or $ComSpec and use `;' to
> > separate
> > +# directories in path lists whereas Un
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> -if test -z "$COMSPEC" && test -z "$ComSpec"; then SEP=':'; else SEP=';';
> fi +# MS-DOS and MS-Windows define $COMSPEC or $ComSpec and use `;' to
> separate
> +# directories in path lists whereas Unix uses `:'. Make an exception for
> +# Cygwin, where we could have eit
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 03:30:36PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 15. April 2006 19:47 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 06:54:56PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > I can't do that because it doesn't depend on cygwin or windows but
> > on miktex or tetex. If you use miktex
Am Samstag, 15. April 2006 19:47 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 06:54:56PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> I can't do that because it doesn't depend on cygwin or windows but
> on miktex or tetex. If you use miktex SEP=';', if you use tetex SEP=':'.
> I am attaching a revised patch
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 06:54:56PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 15. April 2006 18:21 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > Very unlikely failure on windows, very unlikely failure on unix, but
> > certain failure with cygwin. It seems to me that you don't care for
> cygwin.
>
> I care far too
Am Samstag, 15. April 2006 18:21 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Very unlikely failure on windows, very unlikely failure on unix, but
> certain failure with cygwin. It seems to me that you don't care for
cygwin.
I care far too much given that I don't use it. If this is a certain
failure on cygwin,
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 06:01:47PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 15. April 2006 17:39 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > So, you look for ';' in the output and if it is there SEP=';',
> > otherwise SEP=':'. Can't fail.
>
> Wrong:
>
> mkdir -p /home/georg/tmp/semi\;colon/tex
> export TEXMFLO
Am Samstag, 15. April 2006 17:39 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> So, you look for ';' in the output and if it is there SEP=';',
> otherwise SEP=':'. Can't fail.
Wrong:
mkdir -p /home/georg/tmp/semi\;colon/tex
export TEXMFLOCAL=/home/georg/tmp/semi\;colon/
kpsewhich --show-path=.tex
.:/home/georg/.te
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 04:56:28PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 14. April 2006 20:56 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > I added a comment and also took into account a fix for the separator
> > in lib/scripts/TeXFiles.sh. Here SEP is set to ';' or ':' simply based
> > on the existence or not
Am Freitag, 14. April 2006 20:56 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> I added a comment and also took into account a fix for the separator
> in lib/scripts/TeXFiles.sh. Here SEP is set to ';' or ':' simply based
> on the existence or not of the environment variable COMSPEC.
> But the cygwin tetex uses ':'
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 08:56:51PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:57:21AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2006 23:39 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>
> > > Is it sufficient adding a comment? Changing that would require more
> > > than one line for
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:57:21AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2006 23:39 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > Is it sufficient adding a comment? Changing that would require more
> > than one line for no good...
>
> If you add a comment with the mount output then it would be OK w
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 06:23:37PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Friday 14 April 2006 16:00, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > I think you don't love APL ;-)
> > >
> > > I never saw it in a real project, so I don't know whether I would love
> > > it :-)
> >
> > I had a collegue which used and love
On Friday 14 April 2006 16:00, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > I think you don't love APL ;-)
> >
> > I never saw it in a real project, so I don't know whether I would love
> > it :-)
>
> I had a collegue which used and loved that programming language.
> I was really impressed by its compactness but
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:57:21AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2006 23:39 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > The output of the command is like this:
> >
> > $ mount --show-cygdrive-prefix
> > Prefix Type Flags
> > /cygdrive system binmode
> >
Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2006 23:39 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> The output of the command is like this:
>
> $ mount --show-cygdrive-prefix
> Prefix Type Flags
> /cygdrive system binmode
>
> so, the inner split returns "/cygdrive system binmode"
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:46:46PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Montag, 10. April 2006 02:52 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > Index: src/support/os_win32.C
> > ===
> > --- src/support/os_win32.C (revision 13615)
> > +++ src/suppo
Am Montag, 10. April 2006 02:52 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Index: src/support/os_win32.C
> ===
> --- src/support/os_win32.C (revision 13615)
> +++ src/support/os_win32.C (working copy)
> @@ -146,6 +158,14 @@ void init(int
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Ok, thanks. But this is exactly my problem: I don't want to commit for
| Enrico if he keeps sending patches regularly.
Some of us must to do this, we should all help review and also the
commit does not have to be done by the same person all the time.
--
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> | > This means that the current developers with commit privileges, but
> | > review, comment and commit the patches for those that do not have such
> | > privileges.
> |
> | I can't parse that sentence. Could you explain i
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:58:28PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Another idea that I had in the meantime was: If a cygwin tetex is found,
> then there is probably also a cygwin config program in the path that
> could be queried for the correct name. If that is the case, then it would
> probably no
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > This means that the current developers with commit privileges, but
| > review, comment and commit the patches for those that do not have such
| > privileges.
|
| I can't parse that sentence. Could you explain it please?
s/but/must
--
Lgb
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 07:09:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | You should get yourself commit privileges and put this in. I would not
> | oppose, but I don't like it enough to do it for you.
>
> Just a note on commit privileges. I am not goin
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:58:28PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 9. April 2006 17:01 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > > No. But I neither saw anyone using the cygwin tetex with native win
> LyX.
> >
> > Then you probably missed a recent thread in the users list ;-)
> > http://thread.gmane
Am Sonntag, 9. April 2006 19:09 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> Just a note on commit privileges. I am not going to give out commit
> privileges for all users/devvies that come along with the occasional
> pach.
>
> A somewhat continous presence, and a shown ability to conform to our
> coding standa
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| You should get yourself commit privileges and put this in. I would not
| oppose, but I don't like it enough to do it for you.
Just a note on commit privileges. I am not going to give out commit
privileges for all users/devvies that come along with the occ
Am Sonntag, 9. April 2006 17:01 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > No. But I neither saw anyone using the cygwin tetex with native win
LyX.
>
> Then you probably missed a recent thread in the users list ;-)
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/28902/focus=28902
Probably.
> Also, give
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:11:37AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 9. April 2006 09:40 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> > On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:45:21PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > > I don't like the hardcoded "/cygdrive/", because that would fail for
> > > people who changed that name.
> >
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
| > | > On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| > | >
| > | >> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
| > | >>> All th
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel&m=114457031207621&w=2
Am Sonntag, 9. April 2006 09:40 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:45:21PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > I don't like the hardcoded "/cygdrive/", because that would fail for
> > people who changed that name.
>
> Have
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
| > On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| >
| >> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
| >>> All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
| >>> confi
Am Sonntag, 9. April 2006 09:40 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:45:21PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > I don't like the hardcoded "/cygdrive/", because that would fail for
> > people who changed that name.
>
> Have you ever met someone doing that?
No. But I neither saw anyone u
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:45:21PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. April 2006 18:14 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
> > configure and configure.py, so this simple patch to os_win32.C
> > allows using the cygwin tetex with a n
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
| > On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| >
| >> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
| >>> All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
| >>> configure and configure.py, so this s
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:52:53PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >>> All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
> >>> configure and c
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:45:21PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. April 2006 18:14 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
> > configure and configure.py, so this simple patch to os_win32.C
> > allows using the cygwin tetex with a
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
configure and configure.py, so this simple patch to os_win32.C
allows using the cygwin tetex with a native
Am Samstag, 8. April 2006 18:14 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
> configure and configure.py, so this simple patch to os_win32.C
> allows using the cygwin tetex with a native win32 LyX.
>
> Log:
> * src/support/os_win32.C: activat
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
> > configure and configure.py, so this simple patch to os_win32.C
> > allows using the cygwin tetex with a native win32 LyX.
>
> H
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
configure and configure.py, so this simple patch to os_win32.C
allows using the cygwin tetex with a native win32 LyX.
Hi Enrico,
Small question: if this patch was applied what would be missing in a
na
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 06:14:36PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
> configure and configure.py, so this simple patch to os_win32.C
> allows using the cygwin tetex with a native win32 LyX.
Ops... renamed dos_path to cygpath ;-)
-
All the necessary machinery to activate it is already present in
configure and configure.py, so this simple patch to os_win32.C
allows using the cygwin tetex with a native win32 LyX.
Log:
* src/support/os_win32.C: activate cygwin-tetex support
Do with it whatever you think fits better ;-)
42 matches
Mail list logo