Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to
| Lars> continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.)
|
| Also, the typical changelogs we have are b
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to
Lars> continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.)
Also, the typical changelogs we have are better than our svn commits.
Are we sure we will still have per
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is
| Lars> using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past.
|
| ChangeLogs are nice when you do not have net
John C. Spray a écrit :
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:10 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
the ChangeLog files anymore.
IMHO we should rather put that information in the lo
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:36:56PM +, John C. Spray wrote:
> One point - it is nice for people downloading tarballs to be able to see
> what's changed here and there, so old fashioned Changelogs should still
> be generated for released tarballs. Hopefully not to difficult to make
> automatic.
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is
Lars> using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past.
ChangeLogs are nice when you do not have net access.
JMarc
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:10 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
> indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
> the ChangeLog files anymore.
>
> IMHO we should rather put that information in the log message on the
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Opinions on dropping changelogs?
| > (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with
| > that either.)
|
| I would say that it seems a good idea.
| What is the usual p
On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Opinions on dropping changelogs?
> (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with
> that either.)
I would say that it seems a good idea.
What is the usual procedure in other projects that use svn?
> --
>
Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
the ChangeLog files anymore.
IMHO we should rather put that information in the log message on the
commit.
_if_ we at some point in time feel that we need som kind of Ch
10 matches
Mail list logo
