Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to
| Lars> continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.)
|
| Also, the typical changelogs we have are better than our svn commits.
| Are we sure we will still have per file/function details? They are
| _very_ useful (and easy with emacs).
We need to improve our commit logs to be more similar to what we
write in the changelog, sure. That is part of the deal if we decide to
drop use of the ChangeLog. (I also like the C-x a in emacs quite a
bit)
Problems with the changelogs as we have them now are:
- There are more than one. Har to figure out which one came
with the same commit. Total disregard of subversion revision
numbers.
- You have to create two logs (++) one for the ChangeLog and
one for the commit log. And yes, you are correct, currently
the commit log suffers.
--
Lgb
