Re: [RFC][PATCH] Replace deprecated mem_fun_ref with lambda

2020-02-18 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 13.02.2020 um 18:03 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 08:45:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I replace a thing I do not really understand with another thing that I do >> not really understand either. Can someone tell me whether the use o lambda >> expression is OK? I d

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Replace deprecated mem_fun_ref with lambda

2020-02-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 13/02/2020 à 18:03, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 08:45:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I replace a thing I do not really understand with another thing that I do not really understand either. Can someone tell me whether the use o lambda expression is OK? I do not know

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Replace deprecated mem_fun_ref with lambda

2020-02-13 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 08:45:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I replace a thing I do not really understand with another thing that I do > not really understand either. Can someone tell me whether the use o lambda > expression is OK? I do not know how to test it. I would be more happy to

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Replace deprecated mem_fun_ref with lambda

2020-02-12 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 2/12/20 2:45 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Hi there, > > Here is a patch to fix a message from Stephan that nobody but me saw, > because I discarded it instead of accepting it :) BTW, Attachment size > was over 500k, what would be a good limit size? > > I replace a thing I do not really unde

[RFC][PATCH] Replace deprecated mem_fun_ref with lambda

2020-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Hi there, Here is a patch to fix a message from Stephan that nobody but me saw, because I discarded it instead of accepting it :) BTW, Attachment size was over 500k, what would be a good limit size? I replace a thing I do not really understand with another thing that I do not really understa