On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:37:26PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> $VISUAL is supposed to be the name of a $EDITOR that doesn't require a
> terminal. Save some pain and just use $VISUAL instead of $EDITOR to
> invoke your editor.
Ah. I did not know that. Maybe because I rarely use editors that don't ne
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:35:53AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > > The preference of an external editor should be stated by setting the
> > > EDITOR environment variale to an appropriate value. No need to re-invent
> > > the wheel...
> >
> > That'
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:38:23AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> And you're going to ignore the Separator below Tooltips how ?
>
> I'm sure that your menu frontend code ignores separators at the top or
> bottom of menus, doesn't it?
I doubt it :)
But if it must, it will still
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:23:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> Another solution: add a method GUIruntime::isImplemented(kb_action)
>> that would return false for not implemented actions. Then these
>> would be ignored by
John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:04:31PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
>> 1) first patch to enable Layout->Preamble
>
> I don't think we want this. Preamble has been moved to the Document
> dialog. We need to make the menus frontend-specific to remove the menu
Ah, I knew I wa
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> And after sending this I contniued to read the thread: sorry (guess I am
> still asleep).
>
> Ed.
Don't worry... For sure you were not the only one... Thanks¸ Alfredo
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:23:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Another solution: add a method GUIruntime::isImplemented(kb_action)
> that would return false for not implemented actions. Then these would
> be ignored by MenuBackend. The advantage is simplicity, and
> possibility to ignore
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:28:56AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Wouldn't it even for 1.3 be simpler to have the 'name' argument and an 'if'
> > cascade in the Qt implementation?
>
> Whatever. It should needs implementing SOMEHOW. Two minutes to code. 10
> minutes to compile on a fast machine
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | redundant now
| Lars> (preamble is in document settings dialog). I also think the |
| Lars> show preamble entry should be removed
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | redundant now
Lars> (preamble is in document settings dialog). I also think the |
Lars> show preamble entry should be removed from the (qt) menu.
Lars> Or just make the QDocument::prea
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 11:10 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:09:35AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > No. I reckon that for 1.3 you should go for the simple to code multiple
> > virtual bool haveXYZ() { return true; }
> > and overload the few cases in Qt where they dec
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| redundant now (preamble is in document settings dialog). I also think the
| show preamble entry should be removed from the (qt) menu.
Or just make the QDocument::preamble pop up...
--
Lgb
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:09:35AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> No. I reckon that for 1.3 you should go for the simple to code multiple
> virtual bool haveXYZ() { return true; }
> and overload the few cases in Qt where they decided that they don't want a
> dialog.
Wouldn't it even for 1.3
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:47 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Excellent idea. It's a major pain that adding a new dialog
> Angus> causes the re-compilation of the whole LyX tree.
>
> In this case, we should also have showDialog(string const & name) and
> a map name->dialog of some sort
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:21 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:27:08AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >
>> Well then, I see no alternative but to write a bunch of 1-line
>> functions > for each frontend (below
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:21 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:27:08AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Well then, I see no alternative but to write a bunch of 1-line functions
> > for each frontend (below). If they default to true, then you'll have to
> > overload only a fe
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:27:08AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Well then, I see no alternative but to write a bunch of 1-line functions for
> each frontend (below). If they default to true, then you'll have to overload
> only a few in the respective frontends...
>
> frontends/Dialogs.h
>
> cl
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:06 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Jean-Marc, none of them are hooked to signals anymore. See
> Angus> xforms/Dialogs_impl.h, xforms/Dialogs2.C.
>
> OK, I see.
>
> Angus> What we could do is have
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc, none of them are hooked to signals anymore. See
Angus> xforms/Dialogs_impl.h, xforms/Dialogs2.C.
OK, I see.
Angus> What we could do is have all these methods return a bool
Angus> telling the core whether the request has
On Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:16, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On Mon Dec 9, 2002 21:04, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1) first patch to enable Layout->Preamble
> > 2) second patch: to
> > a) eliminate a crash on Layout->Preamble->Edit->Cancel (a NULL
> > point er was assigned to a string)
>
On Mon Dec 9, 2002 21:04, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1) first patch to enable Layout->Preamble
> 2) second patch: to
> a) eliminate a crash on Layout->Preamble->Edit->Cancel (a NULL
> point er was assigned to a string)
> b) adds 'xterm -e ' when calling the editor from $EDI
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 8:45 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:04:31PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein
>
> John> wrote:
> >> 1) first patch to enable Layout->Preamble
>
> John> I don't think we want this. Prea
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What about the idea of disabling preamble if it is not hooked to a
>> signal? I can do that if someone tells me how I can test for this
>> condition.
Juergen> What about the optitem (relate
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> tooltip specific issues
frontend specific issues...
Jürgen.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What about the idea of disabling preamble if it is not hooked to a
> signal? I can do that if someone tells me how I can test for this
> condition.
What about the optitem (related to frontend) idea? Then you can disable
tooltips and child processes too, and I'm shure
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:04:31PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein
John> wrote:
>> 1) first patch to enable Layout->Preamble
John> I don't think we want this. Preamble has been moved to the
John> Document dialog. We need to make the menus fro
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:35:53AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > The preference of an external editor should be stated by setting the
> > EDITOR environment variale to an appropriate value. No need to re-invent
> > the wheel...
>
> That's how it's implemented right now. The problem is that
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:27:30PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> It looks broken anyway. Maybe it's better to call an external editor
>> configurable by preferences?
>
> The preference of an external editor should be stated by setting the
> EDITOR environment variale
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:27:30PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> It looks broken anyway. Maybe it's better to call an external editor
> configurable by preferences?
The preference of an external editor should be stated by setting the EDITOR
environment variale to an appropriate value. No nee
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:04:31PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> 1) first patch to enable Layout->Preamble
I don't think we want this. Preamble has been moved to the Document
dialog. We need to make the menus frontend-specific to remove the menu
item (and others like Help->Tooltips). But exa
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | b) adds 'xterm -e ' when calling the editor from $EDITOR
>
> I am not so sure about this one... what if my $EDITOR is "emacsclient"?
>
An xterm will flash for a second and the editor will be launched correctly I
guess (?). Isn't it better than the presen
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 1) first patch to enable Layout->Preamble
The qt people must look at this one.
| 2) second patch: to
| a) eliminate a crash on Layout->Preamble->Edit->Cancel (a NULL point
| er was assigned to a string)
Ok, I guess. But some more spaces s
Hi,
1) first patch to enable Layout->Preamble
2) second patch: to
a) eliminate a crash on Layout->Preamble->Edit->Cancel (a NULL point
er was assigned to a string)
b) adds 'xterm -e ' when calling the editor from $EDITOR
Hope it's of some use, Alfredo
Index: Dialogs2.C
==
Ok.. one more.. how do I get the Preferences dialog? Edit -> Preferences
doesn't pop up anything.. and I tried looking at the other menus but
can't seem to find it..
Also, when I type, there's a significant delay between the keyboard
stroke and the visual.. and if I type continuously then the char
>
> you can find it in the document settings dialog
>
Ok.. thanks..
Btw, just wanted to mention that the QT frontend is so much better than
xforms.. and I don't mean that just cos of the appearance.. it is really
more efficient.. it takes fewer clicks to do almost anything and
browsing thru fo
On Thu Oct 31, 2002 15:06, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Hi.. in the qt frontend, when I do Layout->Preamble, nothing happens,
> i.e. no Preamble box pops up... is this a known problem?
you can find it in the document settings dialog
Hi.. in the qt frontend, when I do Layout->Preamble, nothing happens,
i.e. no Preamble box pops up... is this a known problem?
Thanks,
nirmal
37 matches
Mail list logo
