On Wednesday 16 October 2002 12:16 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:15:42PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > You mean getLabelList -> fillLabelList? It's a nice idea.
> > Not sure I like "fill" though. You're appending to it.
>
> Ok, so 'appendToLabelList'.
>
> I don't care abo
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:15:42PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> You mean getLabelList -> fillLabelList? It's a nice idea. Not
> sure I like "fill" though. You're appending to it.
Ok, so 'appendToLabelList'.
I don't care about the name, I just do not want to see the dummy returns
if nothing is
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 12:09 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> [The second "problem" remains, though...]
You mean getLabelList -> fillLabelList? It's a nice idea. Not
sure I like "fill" though. You're appending to it.
A
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:07:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> André, where is this destined to be used? If it's destined for
> the frontends, then the xforms frontend already has a "sort"
> button in the Reference dialog that does just this. This has the
> advantage of displaying in sorted o
Index: buffer.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/buffer.C,v
retrieving revision 1.387
diff -u -p -r1.387 buffer.C
--- buffer.C25 Sep 2002 12:19:13 - 1.387
+++ buffer.C16 Oct 2002 08:22:14 -
@@
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 9:29 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The patch attached sorts lables alphanumerically. This is nice
> uif you have a hundred of them and stick to the 'sec:*',
> 'eq:*' naming convention.
>
> It's a new feature though.
>
> Ok to apply anyway?
André, where is this destined t
The patch attached sorts lables alphanumerically. This is nice uif you have
a hundred of them and stick to the 'sec:*', 'eq:*' naming convention.
It's a new feature though.
Ok to apply anyway?
---
Related question: Would it be ok to change the functions
vector getLabelList() const
into s
