Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
> writes:
>
> | This is what it looks like simplifed and rewritten to use
> | boost.filesystem.
>>
> | I have not changed the visual apparence of the dialog, so there are
> | one widget too many on it currently (unused).
>
> Ju
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| This is what it looks like simplifed and rewritten to use
| boost.filesystem.
>
| I have not changed the visual apparence of the dialog, so there are
| one widget too many on it currently (unused).
Just a note that the now unused widget really sho
Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I am waiting for comments on it... and you might not be too happy
>
| I'm happy with it.
>
>> with it either since I have not implemented the functions in fs_extras
>> for Win.
>> is_readable
>> is_writable
>> is_reado
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I am waiting for comments on it... and you might not be too happy
I'm happy with it.
with it either since I have not implemented the functions in fs_extras
for Win.
is_readable
is_writable
is_readonly
and a new version of copy_file.
I'll implement that, provided Elias doe
Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| When will you be committing your boost filesystem stuff?
>
| I'm kind of waiting for it... I'd like to roll a new patch today, as
| my last day of paternity leave, and I'd like that stuff to be in there.
I am waiting for comments on it... and you
When will you be committing your boost filesystem stuff?
I'm kind of waiting for it... I'd like to roll a new patch today, as my
last day of paternity leave, and I'd like that stuff to be in there.
Regards,
Asger
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Hey... you left me just as clue-less. What is "I-P"?
>
| My bad. I was tryig to remember a Jürgen Vigna favourite :-P. See the very
| last item in http://members.aol.com/bearpage/smileys.htm
":-P nya!"
Is that some ki
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Hey... you left me just as clue-less. What is "I-P"?
My bad. I was tryig to remember a Jürgen Vigna favourite :-P. See the very
last item in http://members.aol.com/bearpage/smileys.htm
> "Here! Have one for the toad."
Huh?
--
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Hmm da mm... I have no idea what "I-P" is... are you goading me?
>
| I never goad. I'm the diplomat around here, apparently.
Hey... you left me just as clue-less. What is "I-P"?
"Here! Have one for the toad."
--
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Hmm da mm... I have no idea what "I-P" is... are you goading me?
I never goad. I'm the diplomat around here, apparently.
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> btw. We have lots and lots of filesystem-race conditions. Most often
>> these does not matter much, but we should plan to get rid of them...
>> fs::exists(foo) && fs::is_directory(foo) is actually racy and can
>> result in a
Martin Vermeer wrote:
What's to comment? Fantastic! The existing code is a pile of ancient,
fossilized poo.
Just what I thought, reading this as a complete non-expert.
Of interest to paleoentologists but crap to the rest of us.
Surely you mean "palaeoentomologists"? As in old bugs?
Maybe. But I
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
btw. We have lots and lots of filesystem-race conditions. Most often
these does not matter much, but we should plan to get rid of them...
fs::exists(foo) && fs::is_directory(foo) is actually racy and can
result in an unwanted exeption since foo can have been deleted betwe
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 03:26:12PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >Please comment.
>
> What's to comment? Fantastic! The existing code is a pile of ancient,
> fossilized poo.
Just what I thought, reading this as a complete non-expert.
> Of interest to paleoentologists but crap to the rest of u
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> This is what it looks like simplifed and rewritten to use
>> boost.filesystem.
>> I have not changed the visual apparence of the dialog, so there are
>> one widget too many on it currently (unused).
>> Please comment.
>
| Wh
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is what it looks like simplifed and rewritten to use
boost.filesystem.
I have not changed the visual apparence of the dialog, so there are
one widget too many on it currently (unused).
Please comment.
What's to comment? Fantastic! The existing code is a pile of ancie
This is what it looks like simplifed and rewritten to use
boost.filesystem.
I have not changed the visual apparence of the dialog, so there are
one widget too many on it currently (unused).
Please comment.
Index: FormFiledialog.C
=
17 matches
Mail list logo
