On Monday 05 March 2001 10:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
> | It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
> | and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C
>
> Have this been comitted?
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
| It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
| and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C
Have this been comitted?
Lgb
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> as a free standing (not FormBase dependent) you can probably avoid the
> signals or at least setup hideSplash to call a Dialogs::destroySplash()
> which could then remove the splash screen entirely.
makes sense.
>
> I can't remember how splash was handle
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Actually, John, I'd redo FormSplash as a stand alone class, not derived from
> > FormBase at all. You redefine or don't use pretty well all the virtual
> > methods(). It's all a bit confusing; imagine what it
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| You're trying to delete the same object twice.
|
| void FormSplash::build()
| {
| dialog_ = build_splash();
| }
|
|
| FD_form_splash * FormSplash::build_splash()
| {
| FD_form_splash *fdui = new FD_form_splash;
| fdui->form->u_vdata = this;
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> You're trying to delete the same object twice.
>
> Capisco?
> A
*d'oh*
sorry, sorry, slow on the take today
john
--
"Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away on
a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy ha
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:55, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > > What a weird way to ask a question !
> >
> > My apologies.
>
> no problem, I would smiley but I know what day it is.
>
> > > Doesn't the "pre" delete the FormSplash object itself rather than
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Actually, John, I'd redo FormSplash as a stand alone class, not derived from
> FormBase at all. You redefine or don't use pretty well all the virtual
> methods(). It's all a bit confusing; imagine what it'll be like in 6 month's
> time!
>
> Angus
M
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:53, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Application form being processed by the Lunatic Asylum as we speak.
>
> ha !
>
> > Anyway, futher comment to FormSplash. You derive it from FormBaseBI which
> > already has a Connection h_.
>
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > What a weird way to ask a question !
>
> My apologies.
no problem, I would smiley but I know what day it is.
> > Doesn't the "pre" delete the FormSplash object itself rather than the
> dialog_.
> > It's the equivalent of "delete this" if the Close
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Application form being processed by the Lunatic Asylum as we speak.
ha !
> Anyway, futher comment to FormSplash. You derive it from FormBaseBI which
> already has a Connection h_.
>
> void FormBaseBI::connect()
> {
> h_ = d_->hideAll.connect(
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:39, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > void FormSplash::CloseCB(FL_OBJECT * ob)
> > {
> > FormSplash * pre = static_cast(ob->form->u_vdata);
> > pre->hide();
> > delete pre->dialog_;
> > pre->dialog_ = 0;
> > + // wh
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:37, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Well currently I consider you to be a b@$@!?d because of all those ^M
> > carriage returns
> > pre->dialog_ = 0;
> > + // why this?
> > delete pre;
> > }
> >
>
> Unless I'm going mad
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> void FormSplash::CloseCB(FL_OBJECT * ob)
> {
> FormSplash * pre = static_cast(ob->form->u_vdata);
> pre->hide();
> delete pre->dialog_;
> pre->dialog_ = 0;
> + // why this?
> delete pre;
> }
>
> This is just a pointer
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Well currently I consider you to be a b@$@!?d because of all those ^M
> carriage returns
> pre->dialog_ = 0;
> + // why this?
> delete pre;
> }
>
Unless I'm going mad, my patch doesn't have either of these features. I'm really
confuse
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:22, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > On Friday 23 February 2001 15:07, John Levon wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
> > > It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
> > > and remo
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2001 15:07, John Levon wrote:
>
> > >
> > This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
> > It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
> > and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C
> >
> > john
>
> The Fo
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:07, John Levon wrote:
> >
> This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
> It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
> and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C
>
> john
The FormSplash patch has gone both into this file and into the FileDi
This should help the iconify situation in xforms.
It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash,
and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C
john
--
On Year 2000 compliance :
"Unfortunately, it is not possible to gather similar
assurances on the compliance of viruses."
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
