Georg Baum wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I did not dismiss your work entirely, please reread my older messages. I
only pointed out that it might not be the cleanup you think it is, and I
said more than once that I don't know the full picture either. Otherwise I
would have complained about a sp
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> Partly. I do know a bit about it, but not enough to completely understand
>> the current selection code, in particular not why there is this static
>> xsel_cache_ variable. This is of course not your doing, but a real
>> cleanup would only be possibl
Georg Baum wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 16. September 2006 18:47 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
I don't need to know. I am just moving code around and this should just
work. I am quite confident actually that it _will_ just work.
OK, suppose it works. Then there
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> Am Samstag, 16. September 2006 18:47 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
>>
>>> I don't need to know. I am just moving code around and this should just
>>> work. I am quite confident actually that it _will_ just work.
>>
>> OK, suppose it works. Then there
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Georg, if you have a comment or an abjection
Abjection, really? ;)
Oups :-)
This is just a typo Georg...
Abdel.
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Georg, if you have a comment or an abjection
Abjection, really? ;)
JMarc
Georg Baum wrote:
selection, so a sensible cleanup IMO would be to rename selectionRequested
to requestSelection and selectionLost to clearSelection.
I've done that and verified that it will compile under X11. Will commit
soon.
Abdel.
Index: BufferView.C
=
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 07:19:16PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 16. September 2006 18:47 schrieb Abdelrazak
Younes:
I don't need to know. I am just moving code around and this
should just work. I am quite confident actually that it
_will_ just work.
OK, suppose it
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 16. September 2006 18:47 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
I don't need to know. I am just moving code around and this should just
work. I am quite confident actually that it _will_ just work.
OK, suppose it works. Then there is still the problem that this is supposed
I suhppose some thing can simplyh be handled entirelyu in the
individual frontends without any(/much) kernel interaction at
all.
This I agree.
Bo
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 07:19:16PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 16. September 2006 18:47 schrieb Abdelrazak
> Younes:
>
> > I don't need to know. I am just moving code around and this
> > should just work. I am quite confident actually that it
> > _will_ just work.
>
> OK, suppose it wo
Am Samstag, 16. September 2006 18:47 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> I don't need to know. I am just moving code around and this should just
> work. I am quite confident actually that it _will_ just work.
OK, suppose it works. Then there is still the problem that this is supposed
to be a cleanup,
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 16. September 2006 16:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Yes, sorry... Attached a patch that should work. Not tested yet.
And you can't test it on windows. I am afraid that you don't know enough
about X selection in order to do this blindly. For example, do you know
Am Samstag, 16. September 2006 16:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> Yes, sorry... Attached a patch that should work. Not tested yet.
And you can't test it on windows. I am afraid that you don't know enough
about X selection in order to do this blindly. For example, do you know
why there is a xsel
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| As the title says.
|
| This patch supports all frontends and is straight forward. I intent to
| put this general code in some code common to all frontends in the
| future.
|
| Abdel.
It looks as if you forgot to remo
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| As the title says.
|
| This patch supports all frontends and is straight forward. I intent to
| put this general code in some code common to all frontends in the
| future.
|
| Abdel.
|
| Log:
| * BufferView:
| - BufferView::selectionRequested()
As the title says.
This patch supports all frontends and is straight forward. I intent to
put this general code in some code common to all frontends in the future.
Abdel.
Log:
* BufferView:
- BufferView::selectionRequested() changed to
docstring const & getStringSelection(), the X11 selecti
17 matches
Mail list logo
