Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-30 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:47:18PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > Go, this is better than nothing and can be completed later. Apparently it's mega controversial so I'll just leave it to Dekel or whatever regards john -- "Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-30 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 20:10, John Levon wrote: > This patch installs lyx2lyx into the path,and places the support .py > into $DATADIR/lyx2lyx > > It does NOT fix using non-installed lyx. I will fix that later, the same way we do for reLyX. > Any comments ? the only change to the script i

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:59:22AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > For now I don't care about installing I run lyx always from the > build-dir. I tried your patch and now I get this errors: That's the same error I get without the patch on File->New. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-29 Thread Juergen Vigna
Dekel Tsur wrote: > Here is a patch for searching the lyx2lyx script in LYXDIR. > I did not change your Makefile patch. > The new makefile should copy lyx2lyx to LYXDIR/lyx2lyx/ > and perhaps add a symbolic link to PREFIX/bin/ For now I don't care about installing I run lyx always from the build-

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-29 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:56:40AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:32:21AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > > Actually I agree with Andre here. We should just leave it in the lyx-libdir. > > Then *you* do the patch Here is a patch for searching the lyx2lyx script in LYXDIR.

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-29 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Well *I* don't have the time and as *your* patch doesn't fix the problem *I* > have with lyx2lyx, *I* don't care about *your* patch. Well OK then ! regards john -- "Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the l

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-29 Thread Juergen Vigna
John Levon wrote: >>Actually I agree with Andre here. We should just leave it in the lyx-libdir. > > Then *you* do the patch Well *I* don't have the time and as *your* patch doesn't fix the problem *I* have with lyx2lyx, *I* don't care about *your* patch. Jug -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-.

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-29 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:32:21AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Actually I agree with Andre here. We should just leave it in the lyx-libdir. Then *you* do the patch > This are LyX Helper applications I don't Nope, read the previous discussion. regards john -- "Take the ideas you find usefu

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-29 Thread Juergen Vigna
John Levon wrote: >>Actually I see no problem in always calling the lib version, and on 'make >>install' to setup a symlink to /usr/whatever/bin. > > It's more hassle and uglier Makefile.am Actually I agree with Andre here. We should just leave it in the lyx-libdir. If distributions like it to g

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-28 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:54:21AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > See the previous discussions on whether a user may want t ocall lyx2lyx > > themselves. The consensus was "yes" > > Sure. But _then_ he has to make sure to add it to his path himself. Why bother ? > Actually I see no problem i

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:06:49AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > Why has lyx2lyx be in the path? Couldn't it be called from the libdir > > directly? > > See the previous discussions on whether a user may want t ocall lyx2lyx > themselves. The consensus was "yes" Sure. But _then_ he has to make su

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-28 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:57:59AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Why has lyx2lyx be in the path? Couldn't it be called from the libdir > directly? See the previous discussions on whether a user may want t ocall lyx2lyx themselves. The consensus was "yes" regards john -- "Take the ideas you fin

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:10:03PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > This patch installs lyx2lyx into the path,and places the support .py > into $DATADIR/lyx2lyx > > It does NOT fix using non-installed lyx. Why has lyx2lyx be in the path? Couldn't it be called from the libdir directly? -- Those who d

Re: [PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This patch installs lyx2lyx into the path,and places the support .py | into $DATADIR/lyx2lyx | | It does NOT fix using non-installed lyx. | | Any comments ? the only change to the script is to import the path of | the .py files ? If this is OK I will com

[PATCH] install lyx2lyx

2002-08-28 Thread John Levon
This patch installs lyx2lyx into the path,and places the support .py into $DATADIR/lyx2lyx It does NOT fix using non-installed lyx. Any comments ? the only change to the script is to import the path of the .py files ? If this is OK I will commit it regards john -- "When your name is Winner,