From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 9:17 AM
>On 07/04/2012 01:53 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> From: Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 5:33 PM
>>
>> Richard, is this something you can put on your todo list? Should I make a
>> trac tick
On 07/04/2012 01:53 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 5:33 PM
Come to think of it, this is something that should be done during
reconfiguration, or whenever we all the TeXFiles.py script, so it can
just be done in that script. Presum
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 5:33 PM
>>Come to think of it, this is something that should be done during
>>reconfiguration, or whenever we all the TeXFiles.py script, so it can
>>just be done in that script. Presumably, there is some python module
>>that wou
On 05/03/2012 04:47 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 9:26 AM
Should we first check if the bst files are indeed different? If they are not
different, then I don't think we need to>>bother the user with extra
inf
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> From: Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 9:26 AM
>
> >> Should we first check if the bst files are indeed different? If they are
> >> not different, then I don't think we need to >>bother the user with extra
> >> information/options.
> >This
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 9:26 AM
>> Should we first check if the bst files are indeed different? If they are not
>> different, then I don't think we need to >>bother the user with extra
>> information/options.
>This isn't a bad idea, but I'm not sure h
On 05/03/2012 02:42 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2012/5/2 Richard Heck:
So perhaps we can decide how to handle this. Let's say you've got
dir1/file.bst and also dir2/file.bst. We display them that way. Now suppose
someone chooses one of them. Should we automatically insert that partial
path? Or
On 05/02/2012 07:16 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 5:39 PM
So perhaps we can decide how to handle this. Let's say you've got
dir1/file.bst and also dir2/file.bst. We display them that way. Now
suppose someone chooses one of them.
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:42:17AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2012/5/2 Richard Heck :
> > So perhaps we can decide how to handle this. Let's say you've got
> > dir1/file.bst and also dir2/file.bst. We display them that way. Now suppose
> > someone chooses one of them. Should we automatical
2012/5/2 Richard Heck :
> So perhaps we can decide how to handle this. Let's say you've got
> dir1/file.bst and also dir2/file.bst. We display them that way. Now suppose
> someone chooses one of them. Should we automatically insert that partial
> path? Or should we, as Jurgen suggested, merely offe
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 5:39 PM
>So perhaps we can decide how to handle this. Let's say you've got
>dir1/file.bst and also dir2/file.bst. We display them that way. Now
>suppose someone chooses one of them. Should we automatically insert that
>partial p
On 05/02/2012 04:57 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 07:44:00PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2012/5/2 Richard Heck:
No, the idea would be to use the full path only when it was needed to
disambiguate. I.e., if you have to bst files in your tree with the same
name. The pr
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 07:44:00PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2012/5/2 Richard Heck :
> > No, the idea would be to use the full path only when it was needed to
> > disambiguate. I.e., if you have to bst files in your tree with the same
> > name. The problem, not that it's a huge one, is th
2012/5/2 Richard Heck :
> No, the idea would be to use the full path only when it was needed to
> disambiguate. I.e., if you have to bst files in your tree with the same
> name. The problem, not that it's a huge one, is that we list both files in
> the dialog, but you get the same result whichever
On 05/02/2012 10:07 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2012/5/2 Richard Heck:
Do you mean give the full path to \bibliographystyle{} as I talked about
above or just show the full path to the user like what tools
Tex information does when the check box is checked.
The first. The downside, of course,
2012/5/2 Richard Heck :
> Do you mean give the full path to \bibliographystyle{} as I talked about
> above or just show the full path to the user like what tools
> Tex information does when the check box is checked.
>
> The first. The downside, of course, is that this is much less portable.
If thi
On 05/01/2012 05:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
*From:* Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:02 PM
>It certainly does seem misleading to offer the user two choices that
do the same thing. But of course there
>could be cases where you had two bst files with the same n
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:02 PM
>It certainly does seem misleading to offer the user two choices that do the
>same thing. But of course there >could be cases where you had two bst files
>with the same name that did different things, though LyX >couldn'
On 05/01/2012 12:39 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I'm not sure how to handle this. I have two .bst files with the same name:
/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/beebe/econometrica.bst
/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/economic/econometrica.bst
Because of this I get duplicate e
I'm not sure how to handle this. I have two .bst files with the same name:
/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/beebe/econometrica.bst
/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/economic/econometrica.bst
Because of this I get duplicate entries when choosing a bibstyle in the bibtex
in
20 matches
Mail list logo
