On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:13:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> ('you' here is _me_ not _you_)
Indeed. I should have made it explicit by saying "Look as We are right".
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 03 May 2002 11:13 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> > I think t
On Friday 03 May 2002 11:13 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> > I think that
> >> >
> >> >str.substr(0) == str
> >
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> > I think that
>> >
>> >str.substr(0) == str
>> >str.substr(0, ) == str
>> >
>> > easy to check though.
>>
>>
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> + if (lyxerr.level() & Debug::GRAPHICS) {
> + string const print_str = (str.size() > 60) ?
> + str.substr(0,60) : str;
> + lyxerr << "Scanstring: " << print_str << en
On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > I think that
> >
> >str.substr(0) == str
> >str.substr(0, ) == str
> >
> > easy to check though.
>
> 21.3.6.7 basic_string::substr[l
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think that
>
>str.substr(0) == str
>str.substr(0, ) == str
>
> easy to check though.
21.3.6.7 basic_string::substr[lib.string::substr]
basic_string
substr(size_type pos = 0, si
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 02 May 2002 6:03 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>> >>I don't who committed this:
>> >>
>> >>2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>
>> >> * fileto
On Thursday 02 May 2002 6:03 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >>I don't who committed this:
> >>
> >>2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> * filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
> >>
> >>
> >>maybe
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>I don't who committed this:
>>
>>2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
>>
>>
>>maybe that I'm getting old, but this is in my ChangeLog, but
>>not changed
On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> I don't who committed this:
>
> 2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
>
>
> maybe that I'm getting old, but this is in my ChangeLog, but
> not changed in my filetools.C and I never s
I don't who committed this:
2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
maybe that I'm getting old, but this is in my ChangeLog, but
not changed in my filetools.C and I never send such patch.
It's part of the attached patch, which is importan
12 matches
Mail list logo