rgheck wrote:
> > At least we can apply the following (makes protected space look like
> > normal space, except for the color).
>
> Fine with me.
done.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
This must be something weird about your fonts. A normal space is the
width of, uh, a normal space and a thin space is 1/6 the width of an
'M'. Thus:
Well, the difference is smaller than before.
These look pretty different. But we could chang
rgheck wrote:
> This must be something weird about your fonts. A normal space is the
> width of, uh, a normal space and a thin space is 1/6 the width of an
> 'M'. Thus:
Well, the difference is smaller than before.
> These look pretty different. But we could change the color, too, if you
> wanted.
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
I've made the spaces match this, more or less, using
width(char_type('M')) for the em size.
Now that I see it, I have to say that I do not really like it. It might be
more WYSIWYG, but at the cost of MYSIWYM. The two most frequently used spaces
rgheck wrote:
> I've made the spaces match this, more or less, using
> width(char_type('M')) for the em size.
Now that I see it, I have to say that I do not really like it. It might be
more WYSIWYG, but at the cost of MYSIWYM. The two most frequently used spaces
(by me), thinspace and normalspac
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
This doesn't seem to be correct. Here is how those spaces are defined
in LaTeX:
\def\enspace{\kern.5em }
\def\enskip{\hskip.5em\relax}
\def\quad{\hskip1em\relax}
\def\qquad{\hskip2em\relax}
I've made the spaces match this, more or less, using
width(char_type('M')) f
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You can take the width of the 'm' letter, which was the original
> definition.
'M' (capital), for that matter. However, this never was the original
definition. The original definition refers to the height of the body (the
metal block of the letter).
> I read some
rgheck wrote:
> Jurgen, would you want it for branch?
Yes.
Jürgen
rgheck wrote:
> Can we find out how big an em is?
An em is exactly the font size. So for a 10pt font, 1 em = 10 pt. Roughly, it
also matches the width of the letter "M".
Jürgen
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, I doubt they're really right, but they look better than what we
> had, which fixes the width of a quad e.g. independently of the font
> size. So: Can we find out how big an em is? Is there some fixed
> relationship between the size of an em and the size of
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:33:54PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
Forgot another one.
Attached is a simple-minded patch that adjusts the display size of some
spaces in LyX. This makes the interword and protected spaces the same
size as a normal space rather than the same size
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:33:54PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>
> Forgot another one.
>
> Attached is a simple-minded patch that adjusts the display size of some
> spaces in LyX. This makes the interword and protected spaces the same
> size as a normal space rather than the same size as an "x", which
Forgot another one.
Attached is a simple-minded patch that adjusts the display size of some
spaces in LyX. This makes the interword and protected spaces the same
size as a normal space rather than the same size as an "x", which in my
default screen fonts looks too big. I've also adjusted the siz
rgheck wrote:
Attached is a simple-minded patch that adjusts the display size of some
spaces in LyX. This makes the interword and protected spaces the same
size as a normal space rather than the same size as an "x", which in my
default screen fonts looks too big. I've also adjusted the size o
Attached is a simple-minded patch that adjusts the display size of some
spaces in LyX. This makes the interword and protected spaces the same
size as a normal space rather than the same size as an "x", which in my
default screen fonts looks too big. I've also adjusted the size of the
quad, wh
15 matches
Mail list logo
