On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:32:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Looking at the patch I have a couple of minor comments ...
>
> + // check if the float type exist
> + if (argument == "figure") {
>
> I guess one day we will support floatingtable ??
Perhaps.
>
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:10:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:59:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > > > So I call others to test it.
>
> What sense does it make to be able to toggle default placement and also
> set left/middle/right ? I don't get it.
This is an error
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:59:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > So I call others to test it.
What sense does it make to be able to toggle default placement and also
set left/middle/right ? I don't get it.
Where's the menu entry for inserting a new floatingfigure ?
john
--
"Please let's not
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:59:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Here is a new patch and a test file.
I am building now.
Looking at the patch I have a couple of minor comments ...
+ // check if the float type exist
+ if (argument == "figure") {
I guess one day we will
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:38:50PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:23:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > So I call others to test it.
>
> Can you make a clean diff against current CVS and I will test it.
Here is a new patch and a test file.
Note that preparing this test f
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:23:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> So I call others to test it.
Can you make a clean diff against current CVS and I will test it.
> Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
> it.
You are probably right after all
thanks
john
--
"
On 29-Apr-2002 Soeren Pietsch wrote:
> Juergen> can always use an office software ;)
>
> he you are not the only one! But one can always drop LyX in favor for
> vi and write pure LaTeX ;)
#:O)
> I personally skipped 1.1.6 and stick with 1.1.5. I have hope that
> 1.2.x will be usable again.
I
Juergen> It's the same for the indented paragraphs also. We droped that too and it
doesn't
Juergen> seem someone wants it back (appart from me as I think it's pretty usefull,
but one
Juergen> can always use an office software ;)
he you are not the only one! But one can always drop LyX in favor
On 29-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
>| it.
>
> I can agree with that.
It's the same for the indented paragraphs also. We droped that too and it doesn't
seem someone wants it back (appart from me as I think it
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
>>
>> Perhaps... I do not expect to find a lot of 1.1.6 lyx files that used
>> floatflt...
>
| Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
| it.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:27:01PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | Here is a patch :)
> >> | Can I apply it ?
> >>
> >> No.
> >
> | Why?
>
> Untested. Make others test it
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The patch to UPGRADING:
>
> ... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
> you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your files.
> But LyX 1.2.0 is so wonderful, so it is worth your time!
Not too
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Here is a patch :)
>> | Can I apply it ?
>>
>> No.
>
| Why?
Untested. Make others test it verify that lyx files form 1.1.6 load
correctly. Then if all tests work out we can commit
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:54:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > If this is such a big issue why didn't you do this patch 6 months or a
> > year ago ?
>
> I wasn't aware of the problem
You really managed to miss all the extra par stuff getting removed ??
> didn't have time.
well ... it's not m
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:52:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > The patch to UPGRADING:
> >
> > ... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
> > you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your fi
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The patch to UPGRADING:
>
> ... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
> you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your files.
> But LyX 1.2.0 is so wonderful, so it is worth your time!
Oh come
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:28:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 will read is as
> > a standard figure. Therefore, the DVI output will be wrong.
>
> This is not my definition of
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 will read is as
> a standard figure. Therefore, the DVI output will be wrong.
This is not my definition of "very bad" to be honest. I think a patch
to UPGRADING would be much bet
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:18:01PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:14:08PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
>
> Is it ? What's wrong exactly ?
If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 wi
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:14:08PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
Is it ? What's wrong exactly ?
Don't we want 1.2.0 to come out ??
john
--
"Taste is predicated on discrimination."
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Here is a patch :)
> | Can I apply it ?
>
> No.
Why?
Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >
>> | Why we don't have a floatingfigure inset ?
>>
>> Because you have not created one.
>
| Here is a patch :)
| Can I apply it ?
No.
--
Lgb
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> | Why we don't have a floatingfigure inset ?
>
> Because you have not created one.
Here is a patch :)
Can I apply it ?
PS: Is InsetFloating a good name ?
patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:41:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Why we don't have a floatingfigure inset ?
because nobody's coded it yet ?
john
--
"I continue to be amazed at what Andrei can make templates do. Some of it
still makes my head hurt."
- Herb Sutter
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 11:04:10AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>>
>> > Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
>> > assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} its
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 11:04:10AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> > Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
> > assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the old extra para
> > stuff.
>
> Ple
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
>> Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
>> assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the old extra para
>> stuff.
>
| Please apply !
done.
--
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:05:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Everyone, 1.1.6 documents that use floatingfigure will work there because (I
> assume) lyx adds \usepackage{floatflt} itself for the old extra para
> stuff.
Please apply !
john
--
"I continue to be amazed at what Andrei can make te
28 matches
Mail list logo
