Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves
the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not
sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the
code, but maybe that could wait.
Mayb
Richard Heck wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think,
solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it,
I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of
the code, but maybe that
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think,
solves the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it,
I'm not sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of
the code, but maybe that could wait.
Maybe y
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves
the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not
sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code,
but maybe that could wait.
Maybe yes.
What I've done i
The attached patch builds on Abdel's earlier work and, I think, solves
the remaining problems. Whether this is the best way to do it, I'm not
sure. Abdel was talking about a more major re-organization of the code,
but maybe that could wait.
What I've done is add an optional argument to LFUN_
