Martin Vermeer wrote:
This is actually an ugly corner of LyX. There is no clean way to modify
the layout file tree in cases like this. But of course one could take it
philosophically and say that, just like with ERT, you're on your own if
you write your own layouts. I suppose it would be better i
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:17:23AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> > > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > > > Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEt
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:19:14AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > I meant that the text in an ERT is not Red but Black, and the font
> > is also wrong. This happens for a few classes, eg. IEEEtran and AMS.
>
> Maybe related to Martin's and Richard's layout works
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:31:50PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>>
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:0
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Btw, did you notice t
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class, ERT becomes EBT?
No... disable the pixmap cache maybe?
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I meant that the text in an ERT is not Red but Black, and the font
is also wrong. This happens for a few classes, eg. IEEEtran and AMS.
Maybe related to Martin's and Richard's layout works?
Abdel.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > > Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class, ERT becomes EBT?
> >
> > No... disable the pixmap cache maybe?
>
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class, ERT becomes EBT?
>
> No... disable the pixmap cache maybe?
;-)
I meant that the text in an ERT is not Red but Black, and the font
is also wr
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I suspect that solving these issues might also solve the missing close
tab button problem.
nope, the close button did not automagically appeared :-(
Hmprf... I thought that
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > I suspect that solving these issues might also solve the missing close
> > tab button problem.
>
> nope, the close button did not automagically appeared :-(
Hmprf... I thought that those "Cannot as
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:03:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Fixed.
Great! Many thanks, Abdel.
However, there seems to be s
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:03:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
> > a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
>
> Fixed.
Great! Many thanks, Abdel.
However, there seems to be some more glitche
On Friday 24 August 2007 08:22:38 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Fixed. We could also offer the user a choice to revert to existing
> display or to create a new display for the same document.
>
> Opinions?
When in doubt do what emacs does: create a new display for the same
document.
> Abdel.
--
J
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Fixed. We could also offer the user a choice to revert to existing
display or to create a new display for the same document.
Opinions?
Abdel.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Fixed.
Abdel.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:25:12AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Is this on windows?
Yes.
Does this happen on any document?
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:36:10PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Really? I'll have a look... Do you mean mult
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:31:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:52:00PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > Hmm, on second
> > > thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:36:10PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
>
> Really? I'll have a look... Do you mean multiple Buffer
On Thursday 23 August 2007 21:31:25 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On third thought, maybe we should only allow Qt snaspshots,
> just to be sure. Don't we already use boost snapshots?
Now that you mention it the solution is to carry our own copy of qt, then qt
and boost will be on the same level...
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Really? I'll have a look... Do you mean multiple BufferView or multiple
Buffer? The later would be embarrassing.
And there's still
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:52:00PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Hmm, on second
> > thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
> >
> > --
> > Enrico
>
> Why, is that a problem? ;-)
Not at all.
$ ./src/l
On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Hmm, on second
> thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
>
> --
> Enrico
Why, is that a problem? ;-)
$ rpm -qi qt4
Name: qt4 Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Nuisance:
> > - Even with only one file opened, a toolbar with a tab appears.
>
> This is fixed.
Ok, thanks.
> > Problems:
> > - The main window bar does not show the filename of a loaded file.
> >
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Nuisance:
- Even with only one file opened, a toolbar with a tab appears.
This is fixed.
Problems:
- The main window bar does not show the filename of a loaded file.
However, after opening another file, the name shows up.
I don't see this bug.
- The list of rece
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:54:54AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Crash:
When loading the attached file, the cursor is not visible and the text
is out of view.
I am not sure about this one but this one is fixed:
I started seeing it after
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:54:54AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > Crash:
> > When loading the attached file, the cursor is not visible and the text
> > is out of view.
>
> I am not sure about this one but this one is fixed:
I started seeing it after your commi
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Crash:
When loading the attached file, the cursor is not visible and the text
is out of view.
I am not sure about this one but this one is fixed:
No scrollbar is present, but if you click in the window,
the view is adjusted (and the scrollbar appears). However, if y
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:25:12AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
> > a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
>
> Is this on windows?
Yes.
> Does this happen on any document?
When trying
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Is this on windows? Does this happen on any document? Could you please
try to disable the pixmap cache in QLPainter.cpp?
Abdel.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Here is my most recent patc
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
- the
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>> Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
> >>> - the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
> >>> - the sp
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
- the splash screen: it is implemented but does not show up.
I solved the splash screen bug
Here
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I actually like this behavior. Why having a scrollbar if there is no
need for it?
Exactly, but then the scrollbar pops up even if it is useless. ;-)
Year, that's the real bug :-)
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I actually like this behavior. Why having a scrollbar if there is no
> need for it?
Exactly, but then the scrollbar pops up even if it is useless. ;-)
A/
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
It's between the two notions.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>
>>> Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
>>>
>>> Abdel.
>>
>> + void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
>>
>> shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
>
> It's between the two noti
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
It's between the two notions. It will indeed add a WorkArea if it does
not curre
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
>
> Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
A/
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
Btw, very nice design description. I think it is very useful.
Thanks. Don't hesitate to complement/modify it once it is in trunk.
Ab
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
Btw, very nice design description. I think it is very useful.
>>> - the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
>>> - the splash screen: it
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 06:13:46PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
> >- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
> >- the splash screen: it is implemented but does not show up.
>
> I solved th
On Friday 17 August 2007 17:49:18 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Some of use are at work you know... ;-)
>
> I know and my real work has suffered from this patch simplification
> which I still think was worth nothing.
The purpose of longer delays applies only to large patches, not to small
ones.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I solved the splash screen bug and there is apparently no objection so
I will commit it.
Please don't get this wrong, I'm serious with the question: What's the
rush?
I assume the people intere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The patch itself is not that big. The changes in BufferView is all
about removal of function and removal of test of the type 'if
(buffer_)' which does not make sense anymore.
So, objection?
Thanks for the updated descri
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I solved the splash screen bug and there is apparently no objection so I
will commit it.
Please don't get this wrong, I'm serious with the question: What's the
rush?
What's the consequence from a development point of v
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The patch itself is not that big. The changes in BufferView is all about
removal of function and removal of test of the type 'if (buffer_)' which
does not make sense anymore.
So, objection?
Thanks for the updated description, I may even dare to
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
- the splash screen: it is implemented but does not show up.
I solved the splash screen bug and there is apparently no objection so I
will commit it.
53 matches
Mail list logo
