On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:56, Bo Peng wrote:
>
> > 2. I do not know linuxdoc and docbook so I can not test, and the
> > implementation is largely broken.
>
> Where can I find a few docbook/linuxdoc files to test the patch? Can
> anyone send me some?
Search in lib/examples, there you have bot
> 1. There is a strange crash with extensive use of this feature. I am
> still tracing the problem, but you may find out the problem just by
> reading my patch.
The bug has been found. The patch works smoothly now.
> 2. I do not know linuxdoc and docbook so I can not test, and the
> implementatio
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 21:15, Bo Peng wrote:
> 2. I do not know linuxdoc and docbook so I can not test, and the
> implementation is largely broken.
Don't care with linuxdoc, I intend to remove its support in 1.5.
In case I have not been clear, I intend to delete the code, lyx2lyx should
ta
Dear developers,
Attached is an implementation of the view-source feature I proposed. Currently
1. view->view source will open "view source" dialog with the source
code of current paragraph or selected paragraphs. (I know nothing
about qt so the dialog is a shameless copy from QLogDialog...)
2. W
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:31:43PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> The updated patch is attached.
Has anyone got a chance to test this patch?
--
Bo Peng
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:35:31PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Isn't this script only called when instant preview is turned on? If
> > so, Preview: Tightpage will always exist.
> Nope.
I do not quite understand when this script will be called. Anyway, I
have enhanced the error handling of my
Bo Peng wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:12:38PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> If the user doesn't have preview-latex installed.
>
> Isn't this script only called when instant preview is turned on? If
> so, Preview: Tightpage will always exist.
Nope.
>> > g: global.
>> Not needed I think. I
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:34:18PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Happynewyear!
You mentioned this already. If you insist: Happy new year to all of you.
Andre'
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:28:10PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Does this compensate for that sore lack of really long words in English?
Incontrovertibly, my sesquipedalian co-conspirator.
Well, I tried at least.
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the t
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:12:13PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> * Grammatical point: don't call them 'wrong formulas'. Call them
>> 'incorrrect formulas', or even 'incorrect formulae'.
>
> I wasn't aware of that consonant tripling rule.
>
> Does this compensate for that
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:12:38PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> If the user doesn't have preview-latex installed.
Isn't this script only called when instant preview is turned on? If so,
Preview: Tightpage will always exist.
> > g: global.
> Not needed I think. If I remember correctly there is
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:12:13PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> * Grammatical point: don't call them 'wrong formulas'. Call them
> 'incorrrect formulas', or even 'incorrect formulae'.
I wasn't aware of that consonant tripling rule.
Does this compensate for that sore lack of really long words in
Bo Peng wrote:
>> I think that if the line doesn't exist, then you should just abort.
>> +if (!/Preview:\s+Tightpage/gcms){
>> // bail out
>
> Under what condition will this line disappear? I thought that this
> line will exist for both correct and incorrect first preview.
If the user doe
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:12:13PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> A question for you:
> Does Latex stop when it encounters the first error, or does it try
> and compile the whole file?
At least on my system, latex does not stop on errors. I created a bunch
of incorrect formulae among many corre
Bo Peng wrote:
> I have updated my previous patch. It now can:
>
> 1. If a wrong formula is entered, a 'formula does not compile' box
> will
>be displayed rather than the orginal lyx math box.
> 2. If a file with wrong formula(s) is opened, the perl script will
>locate the wrong formula(s
I have updated my previous patch. It now can:
1. If a wrong formula is entered, a 'formula does not compile' box will
be displayed rather than the orginal lyx math box.
2. If a file with wrong formula(s) is opened, the perl script will
locate the wrong formula(s) and replace them with 'fo
> The information is present in the latex log file. I'm not saying that
> it is easy to manipulate, but it is certainly possible.
Great. I will mess with the log file and try to identify the wrong
formula when a file is loaded. This will certainly make this patch more
useful.
--
Bo Peng
Bo Peng wrote:
> < sorry for the PM to Leeming. >
Not a problem.
>> Loading an existing document containing such an inset results in no
>> previews being generated at all, as now.
>
> Locating a wrong formula among others is extremely difficult (may
> have to compile all formulas one by one.) s
< sorry for the PM to Leeming. >
> Loading an existing document containing such an inset results in no
> previews being generated at all, as now.
Locating a wrong formula among others is extremely difficult (may have
to compile all formulas one by one.) so there is no good solution yet.
> In c
Bo Peng wrote:
> By wrong formula, I mean things like $\text{\alpha}$ entered by C-M
> C-M \alpha etc. I have discussed this problem in the user list.
>
> Currently, with instant preview turned on,
> 1. If a wrong formula is entered, instant preview will fail and do
>nothing.
> 2. If a file w
By wrong formula, I mean things like $\text{\alpha}$ entered by C-M C-M
\alpha etc. I have discussed this problem in the user list.
Currently, with instant preview turned on,
1. If a wrong formula is entered, instant preview will fail and do
nothing.
2. If a file with any wrong formula is ope
On Thursday 27 June 2002 8:16 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >>This was not my point! I do not understand why this is
> >>defined in the preferences, where things should be saved
> >>which can be modified by the us
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>This was not my point! I do not understand why this is
>>defined in the preferences, where things should be saved
>>which can be modified by the user. To get an asynchronously
>>loading of the math preview I
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> This was not my point! I do not understand why this is
> defined in the preferences, where things should be saved
> which can be modified by the user. To get an asynchronously
> loading of the math preview I do not need this in the pr
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 27 June 2002 7:24 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>>>No. André means
>>>
>>>\converter "lyxpreview" "xpm" "sh $$LYXLIBscripts/lyxpreview2xpm.sh
>>>
>>ok, understood. But anyway, I do not understand the sense of
>>this converter. The script
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:24:07PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> ok, understood. But anyway, I do not understand the sense of
> this converter.
It's easier to play around with it if it's a script, and it fits very well
in the converter concept.
> The script schould be called from within LyX. The
On Thursday 27 June 2002 7:24 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > No. André means
> >
> > \converter "lyxpreview" "xpm" "sh $$LYXLIBscripts/lyxpreview2xpm.sh
>
> ok, understood. But anyway, I do not understand the sense of
> this converter. The script schould be called from within
Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> No. André means
>
> \converter "lyxpreview" "xpm" "sh $$LYXLIBscripts/lyxpreview2xpm.sh
ok, understood. But anyway, I do not understand the sense of
this converter. The script schould be called from within LyX. The user
has still the possibility to edit the script i
On Thursday 27 June 2002 6:54 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:13:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >>\converter "lyxpreview" "xpm" "sh LYXDIR/lib/scripts/lyxpreview2xpm.sh
> >> $$i $$o" ""
> >>
> >>where LYXDIR is ...
> >
> > Could we fix this somehow
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:13:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>>\converter "lyxpreview" "xpm" "sh LYXDIR/lib/scripts/lyxpreview2xpm.sh $$i $$o" ""
>>
>>where LYXDIR is ...
>>
>
> Could we fix this somehow properly?
>
> What's the way to access LyX's "own converters"
On Thursday 27 June 2002 6:49 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:13:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > \converter "lyxpreview" "xpm" "sh LYXDIR/lib/scripts/lyxpreview2xpm.sh
> > $$i $$o" ""
> >
> > where LYXDIR is ...
>
> Could we fix this somehow properly?
>
> What's the way
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:13:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> \converter "lyxpreview" "xpm" "sh LYXDIR/lib/scripts/lyxpreview2xpm.sh $$i $$o" ""
>
> where LYXDIR is ...
Could we fix this somehow properly?
What's the way to access LyX's "own converters" from lib/scripts?
Andre'
--
Those wh
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 07:42:33PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> So we don't want the user to be able to switch this feature on GUI-wise?
> (I think André wants to keep it switched off by default)
A preference is fine, but it should be switched off by default.
Andre'
--
Those who desire
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 07:27:51PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I have not tested it, because I don't have preview-latex, but it should work.
Our stuff is currently completely independent of preview-latex.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will no
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > you don't need it. What you do need is this in your preferences file:
Ah, you mean, I don't need preview latex.
Silly me.
Jürgen
Angus Leeming wrote:
> you don't need it. What you do need is this in your preferences file:
>
> \preview true
> \format "lyxpreview" "lyxpreview" "LyX preview" ""
> \converter "lyxpreview" "xpm" "sh LYXDIR/lib/scripts/lyxpreview2xpm.sh $$i
> $$o" ""
>
> where LYXDIR is ...
>
> and it should all
On Thursday 27 June 2002 6:27 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Anyone interested in a preview latex checkbox in preferences?
> I think LnF -> Misc is the right place.
> I have not tested it, because I don't have preview-latex, but it should
> work.
you don't need it. What you do need is this in
Anyone interested in a preview latex checkbox in preferences?
I think LnF -> Misc is the right place.
I have not tested it, because I don't have preview-latex, but it should work.
Jürgen.
BTW: the fonts in current CVS (after Porto) are HUGE.
Index: src/frontends/xforms/ChangeLog
===
38 matches
Mail list logo
