Re: [PATCH]: Forked calls

2002-02-19 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 4:53 pm, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Tuesday 19 February 2002 4:42 pm, Jules Bean wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:28:39PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > On Tuesday 19 February 2002 4:18 pm, John Levon wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:59:09PM +, Angus

Re: [PATCH]: Forked calls

2002-02-19 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 4:42 pm, Jules Bean wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:28:39PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 February 2002 4:18 pm, John Levon wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:59:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > > > > > I'd like to commit the attached pat

Re: [PATCH]: Forked calls

2002-02-19 Thread Jules Bean
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:28:39PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Tuesday 19 February 2002 4:18 pm, John Levon wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:59:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > > > I'd like to commit the attached patch. > > > > are you trying to confuse :) > > > > +

Re: [PATCH]: Forked calls

2002-02-19 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 4:18 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:59:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > I'd like to commit the attached patch. > > are you trying to confuse :) > > + if (pid<=0) { // Fork failed. > + retval = 1; Sorry, I

Re: [PATCH]: Forked calls

2002-02-19 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:59:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > I'd like to commit the attached patch. are you trying to confuse :) + if (pid<=0) { // Fork failed. + retval = 1; please separate out the three cases after fork() ! as it is the comment is dead

[PATCH]: Forked calls

2002-02-19 Thread Angus Leeming
I'd like to commit the attached patch. It resurrects Asger's forked call wrapper and its controller as a working entity by giving the controller a timer. I've re-worked the interface a little and given the classes kill() methods too. I've also replaced the pointer to a callback function with a