Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 18:57:57, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta
> On 03/05/2017 17:42, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> >> Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ?
> >
> > I have this one consistently failing:
> >
> > findadv
On 03/05/2017 17:42, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ?
I have this one consistently failing:
findadv-02-in.txt: FAILED
will dig shortly (I'm going off-line a few hours).
this is what I
On 03/05/2017 17:42, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ?
I have this one consistently failing:
findadv-02-in.txt: FAILED
will dig shortly (I'm going off-line a few hours).
this is what I
Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 17:42:25, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta
> On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ?
>
> I have this one consistently failing:
>
> findadv-02-in.txt: FAILED
This one passes here.
The ones which
On 03/05/2017 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Kornel, would you mind to re-run the tests ?
I have this one consistently failing:
findadv-02-in.txt: FAILED
will dig shortly (I'm going off-line a few hours).
T.
Le 03/05/2017 à 17:37, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
As for the "word-findadv" verb, I don't have strong opinions about
hiding that, and
I don't know for sure what these "Edit" vs "Hidden" etc. flags are for
:(...
It is to know in what group the function appears when one tries to
customize the b
On 03/05/2017 11:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
3610cdf66944dc790e2e3df666e99f33c45b1ede
Yes, this is much less surprising than to two other commits.
this is now (correctly) fixed in
commit cf6bbe21
Author: Tommaso Cucinotta
Date: Wed May 3 17:32:31 2017 +0200
findadv: amend [8c1018
my bad, quite blind commits without testing, I just reverted the suppression of the
"word-findadv" lfun name,
but, as you just pointed out, it was actually the crash fix to break all tests
:-)! (just confirmed that
reverting that as well recovers a working findadv pane)
T.
On 03/05/201
Le 03/05/2017 à 10:44, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Testing manually, I see, that replace is not working. (E.g. findadv does not
find anything)
Hm, test passes after reverting also 3610cdf66944dc790e2e3df666e99f33c45b1ede
Yes, this is much less surprising than to two other commits.
JMarc
Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 10:08:40, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 03/05/2017 à 10:05, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 09:41:08, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >
> >> Le 03/05/2017 à 07:48, Stephan Witt a écrit :
> >>> Something like the attached patch is needed!?
>
Le 03/05/2017 à 10:05, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 09:41:08, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 03/05/2017 à 07:48, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Something like the attached patch is needed!?
Yes, I just did that.
JMarc
You did, but without test.
# ctest -R findadv
Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 09:41:08, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 03/05/2017 à 07:48, Stephan Witt a écrit :
> > Something like the attached patch is needed!?
>
> Yes, I just did that.
>
> JMarc
You did, but without test.
# ctest -R findadv
...
10% tests passed, 2
Le 03/05/2017 à 07:48, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Something like the attached patch is needed!?
Yes, I just did that.
JMarc
Am 03.05.2017 um 01:34 schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta :
>
> commit 8c10182962efa643edfcfbe64fc830b5fc0d9a65
> Author: Tommaso Cucinotta
> Date: Wed May 3 01:29:36 2017 +0200
>
>findadv: hide word-findadv verb from the mini-buffer
>
>The current set of options to provide include names of
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
