Le 11/04/2014 09:28, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
It's here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg181023.html
Can you queue this in 2.2-staging, so we won't forget ?
I did that.
JMarc
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> 11/04/2014 10:31, Scott Kostyshak:
>
>> I think you and Vincent are talking about something different. I'm
>> talking about automake 1.15. Suppose it is released tomorrow. LyX 2.1
>> will fail to compile with it. I'm wondering if this
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, we always specify maximum versions, but I guess that we should just
> warn against them.
I agree, we should ban only versions we explicitly know not to work.
I always have to do some magic when bisecting older versions because
they think my current automake setu
11/04/2014 10:31, Scott Kostyshak:
I think you and Vincent are talking about something different. I'm
talking about automake 1.15. Suppose it is released tomorrow. LyX 2.1
will fail to compile with it. I'm wondering if this should be
mentioned in INSTALL or not. I have no experience with maximum
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 10/04/14 22:54, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
>
>> I don't know about these limitations for master.
>>
>> What is the fix and why didn't we apply it ?
>
>
> Our code is ready, but there are some distclean-related problems with so
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 10/04/14 22:54, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
>
>> I don't know about these limitations for master.
>>
>> What is the fix and why didn't we apply it ?
>
>
> Our code is ready, but there are some distclean-related problems with s
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 10/04/14 22:54, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
>
>> I don't know about these limitations for master.
>>
>> What is the fix and why didn't we apply it ?
>
>
> Our code is ready, but there are some distclean-related problems with s
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
> Op 10 apr. 2014 22:49 schreef "Scott Kostyshak" :
>> > If you have checked this out from Git, you need to have:
>> > * automake >= 1.8
>> > -* autoconf >= 2.59d
>> > -* gettext >= 0.16.1
>> > +* autoconf >= 2.60
>>
>> Would it m
Le 10/04/14 22:54, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
I don't know about these limitations for master.
What is the fix and why didn't we apply it ?
Our code is ready, but there are some distclean-related problems with
some recent versions of automake, IIRC. At the time, I remember
proposing a
Le 10/04/14 22:56, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
"If you change the translations and want them to have effect you need
gettext.". would be more appropriate then ?
Yes.
JMarc
Op 10 apr. 2014 22:49 schreef "Scott Kostyshak" :
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
wrote:
> > commit 30d1cf47c18bf938e6be3e3fd45a3115cff435c1
> > Author: Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > Date: Thu Apr 10 22:35:32 2014 +0200
> >
> > Update INSTALL
> >
> > diff --git a/IN
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> commit 30d1cf47c18bf938e6be3e3fd45a3115cff435c1
> Author: Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Date: Thu Apr 10 22:35:32 2014 +0200
>
> Update INSTALL
>
> diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
> index 17592e1..6202ee8 100644
> --- a/INSTALL
> ++
12 matches
Mail list logo
