Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-08-03 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Richard Heck wrote: > > You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. > > However, TeXLive 2007 does not ship the oolatex script. Therefore I'd prefer > the verbose command. Right, it's up to the user to create oolatex and friends with

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Michelsen
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb: Richard Heck wrote: This would do it, preserving the simple oolatex call first. Note that since we have the "latex" flag we don't need the "needaux" flag. The "latex" flag doesn't work for me. I get the following error: --- warning --- Problem with command line ---

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: This would do it, preserving the simple oolatex call first. Note that since we have the "latex" flag we don't need the "needaux" flag. The "latex" flag doesn't work for me. I get the following error: --- warning --- Problem with command li

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > This would do it, preserving the simple oolatex call first. Note that > since we have the "latex" flag we don't need the "needaux" flag. The "latex" flag doesn't work for me. I get the following error: --- warning --- Problem with command line --- error --- Can't find/open f

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. However, TeXLive 2007 does not ship the oolatex script. Therefore I'd prefer the verbose command. Should this be added to configure.py? Yes. This would do it, preserving the s

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. However, TeXLive 2007 does not ship the oolatex script. Therefore I'd prefer the verbose command. > Should this be added to configure.py? Yes. Jürgen

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Pavel Sanda
> You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. > > Should this be added to configure.py? isnt it already chceked ? tools -> reconfigure found it for me. pavel

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Tim Michelsen wrote: Hello, before I enter a official request at bugzilla I'd like to ask you what you think about this: There's already a report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085 Are there any plans to include a export option to Open Document

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Michelsen
There's already a report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085 Ooops. I updated the wiki page: http://wiki.lyx.org/Tools/LyX2OpenOffice and also the bugzilla entry: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Tim Michelsen wrote: > Hello, > before I enter a official request at bugzilla I'd like to ask you what > you think about this: There's already a report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085 > Are there any plans to include a export option to Open Document Format > (ODF) which could be rea

[Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Michelsen
Hello, before I enter a official request at bugzilla I'd like to ask you what you think about this: Are there any plans to include a export option to Open Document Format (ODF) which could be read and processed by numerous programs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_applications_supporting