On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 11:49:53PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 04:32:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > I am not even pretending that I understand this problem field. Does
> > anyone else? And is this patch, trial-and-error as it is, welcome in
> > 1.4.0cvs?
>
> The f
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 04:32:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I am not even pretending that I understand this problem field. Does
> anyone else? And is this patch, trial-and-error as it is, welcome in
> 1.4.0cvs?
The foot-like stuff seems to be needed in any case, and for the other
stuff the
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:58:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> The source is full of bugs due to two persons having different idea of
> how things are supposed to work and half-implementing it[*]. This is
> where we see t
