Georg Baum wrote:
I updated the patch and made it cleaner. Now libQtCore is considered a
support library that can be used like boost or libz. If anybody does not
like this, speak up, but a simple "no" is not enough, I want to see a
proposal for a different implementation of the
FileName::toFil
Am Samstag, 9. Dezember 2006 12:52 schrieb Georg Baum:
> I updated the patch and made it cleaner. Now libQtCore is considered a
> support library that can be used like boost or libz. If anybody does not
> like this, speak up, but a simple "no" is not enough, I want to see a
> proposal for a dif
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 06:28:45PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 11:36:10AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
[...]
> > Now you ignore the fact that all this stuff (except sessions) exists
> > already from the multiple-frontend times, so I don't see much
> > reinventing the wheel he
Georg Baum schrieb:
Am Freitag, 8. Dezember 2006 18:28 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
[I am doing Windows installers right now. Far from funny to say the
least, and a complete waste of time as far as I am concerned. One
learns thing one never wanted to know of. Four weeks to get the
graphical equivale
Am Freitag, 8. Dezember 2006 18:28 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> [I am doing Windows installers right now. Far from funny to say the
> least, and a complete waste of time as far as I am concerned. One
> learns thing one never wanted to know of. Four weeks to get the
> graphical equivalent of 'rpm -i *
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 11:36:10AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2006 18:09 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
>
> > I am able to change my opinion when reality proves me wrong.
>
> Sure, only idiots never change their opinion. I was surprised because
> to me the current status does n
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:44:14PM +1800, Bo Peng wrote:
> >The whole file name business is pretty much reinventing the wheel,
> >and so is the session stuff and preference management. Same goes for
> >external processes when I think about it, but that does not seem to
> >suck much resources nowad
Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2006 18:09 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> I am able to change my opinion when reality proves me wrong.
Sure, only idiots never change their opinion. I was surprised because to me
the current status does not look much different from that of 6 weeks ago.
And to avoid misunder
The whole file name business is pretty much reinventing the wheel,
and so is the session stuff and preference management. Same goes for
external processes when I think about it, but that does not seem to
suck much resources nowadays...
You can also include workarea, mouse/event handling, copy p
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 12:18:22PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 19:25 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
>
> > When I see the conversion orgies in the frontend I am tempted to
> > suggest using QtCore as platform abstraction layer instead of boost::fs
> > + boost::foobar + homegrow
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:19:25PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >Of course, Lars is far away right now...
>
> Where is he actually? Long time since we heard sth from him...
I don't really know. Last time I saw him was in Copenhagen Main
Station and he sort of looked ok ;-}
Andre'
Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 19:25 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> When I see the conversion orgies in the frontend I am tempted to
> suggest using QtCore as platform abstraction layer instead of boost::fs
> + boost::foobar + homegrown vegetables.
I am really sursprised to read that from the person who
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:09:03PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 18:18 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
Couldn't we introduce some convenience functions here?
if (orig_from_name.exists())) {
Yes. I did not do it so far because we have too man
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:09:03PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 18:18 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> > Couldn't we introduce some convenience functions here?
> >
> > if (orig_from_name.exists())) {
>
> Yes. I did not do it so far because we have too many convenie
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 18:18 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> Couldn't we introduce some convenience functions here?
>
> if (orig_from_name.exists())) {
Yes. I did not do it so far because we have too many convenience functions
already (basically we use boost::filesystem and our own
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:57:02PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - if (!fs::exists(orig_from)) {
> + if (!fs::exists(orig_from_name.toFilesystemEncoding())) {
> + FileName const filename(fname);
> + if (fs::exists(filename.toFilesystemEncoding())) {
> + Fil
16 matches
Mail list logo
