Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
i have put it in. anyway at first try:
1. load math manual
2. search math exrp E/F
3. search
4. kaboom
I have tracked down the problem to a much simpler example:
1. New document
2. Enter any text containing a double quote character (")
3. AdvSearch for whatever
4. Asse
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please, find attached a patch that lets the math-searching capability
> work again (it is made against the advsearch trunk), plus an encapsulation
> of search-related debugging messages (that helped me track down the
> issue) within the Debug::DEBUG logging level.
Hi,
please, find attached a patch that lets the math-searching capability
work again (it is made against the advsearch trunk), plus an encapsulation
of search-related debugging messages (that helped me track down the
issue) within the Debug::DEBUG logging level.
If you search along the patch, th
Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
i don't believe reimporting-back stuff is doable 100% correct
so this does not look like good direction.
I know how hard is to make tex2lyx import something correctly,
or at least how expected. Here we would "play at home field", i.e.,
we would import something that ha
Konrad Hofbauer wrote:
> You do not think this could make it into 1.6.x (with x>0) ???
because i don't see anybody working hard on finishing it...
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> while i played with this yesterday i come to understand that except
> some bugfixing there are still features disabled and not implemented,
> so i'm bit pesimistic that this will become part of 1.6.x,
> moreover that you don't have time on it...
Considering a how-much-appreci
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> With regexp (and ignore-format off), the easiest way seems
> to be exporting to LaTeX the matching block, applying the
> replace-part of the regexp, then reimporting it back.
i don't believe reimporting-back stuff is doable 100% correct
so this does not look like good di
Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
thanks, commited. btw the now-disappeared replace-field means
replacing was not working up to now, right?
Yep, also, I can remember some comment about keeping
the first dialog as simple as possible, then possibly having
additional tab panes like "advanced" or "replace"
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> The attached file
> src/frontends/qt4/ui/SearchAdvUi.ui
> hopefully looks like better.
thanks, commited. btw the now-disappeared replace-field means
replacing was not working up to now, right?
i also setup the following wiki for gathering the bugs around:
http://wiki.ly
