On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:15:29AM +1100, Ben Stanley wrote:
> I propose a grep for lyx::pos_type and a double check...
Guess what I did the last ten minutes...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:47:50AM +1100, Ben Stanley wrote:
>
>>This constructor passes an un-initialised pos to insertStringAsLines. I
>>presume it should be initialised to 0?
>>
>
>And now to the explanation: I saw the "useless" variable, removed it. Then
>noticed that t
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:47:50AM +1100, Ben Stanley wrote:
> This constructor passes an un-initialised pos to insertStringAsLines. I
> presume it should be initialised to 0?
And now to the explanation: I saw the "useless" variable, removed it. Then
noticed that the parameter was passed by (non
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:47:50AM +1100, Ben Stanley wrote:
> This constructor passes an un-initialised pos to insertStringAsLines. I
> presume it should be initialised to 0?
Gasp! Yes. Certainly. And it used to be. My fault.
I can even explain how this evolved... but I'll try to fix it first.
This constructor passes an un-initialised pos to insertStringAsLines. I
presume it should be initialised to 0?
This causes an assert failure down in Pragraph::pimpl::insertChar().
// This constructor is used for reading old InsetInfo
InsetNote::InsetNote(Buffer const * buf, string const & conte
