Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:24:52PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> Much better. Thanks. The cursor can be moved with word-forward. > > For to satisfy my curiosity: why word-forward and not char-forward? Don't know. I used 'word-backward' to jump from behind the still-open ERT inset t

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:59:36PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: >> OK, with my latest commit, toggle-inset will close the inset you >> are in. Note that the cursor will be in front of the inset, not >> after it. >> >>

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:59:36PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > OK, with my latest commit, toggle-inset will close the inset you are > in. Note that the cursor will be in front of the inset, not after it. > > Is that better for you? Much better. Thanks. The cursor can be moved with word

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:50:38AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: How can I bind a key to do what I want (leave inset, Andre> close it, position cursor behind it)? >> I don't know... Maybe ERT insets should be created a

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:50:38AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> How can I bind a key to do what I want (leave inset, close it, > Andre> position cursor behind it)? > > I don't know... Maybe ERT insets should be created as inline by > default? In this case, cursor right would mostly

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:12:57PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: >> However, I would not want C-l to work as it used to (a typical font >> change behaviour, not a insert-thing behaviour), since it would >> need to add u

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:12:57PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > However, I would not want C-l to work as it used to (a typical font > change behaviour, not a insert-thing behaviour), since it would need > to add ugly code, unless I miss something obvious. How can I bind a key to do what I

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-06 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:02:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The simple workaround was to have the proper error message. I do not > know about your actual problem. What is Ctrl+L in cua? ert-insert if I am not mistaken. In 1.1.6 you typed 'C-l \macro C-l' to get '\macro' exported to

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:15:41PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes John> wrote: >> Yes. Do you want me to apply it? John> I can't remember, did I actually have a patch or did you ?? I commited your patch. JMarc

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:10:59PM +, John Levon wrote: >> > Well - nothing wrong with 'Command not allowed without any >> document open'. >> > >> &

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-06 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:10:59PM +, John Levon wrote: > > Well - nothing wrong with 'Command not allowed without any document open'. > > > > Except that it is somewhat unexpected if it is the response to 'Ctrl-L' in > > an ERT inset. > >

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-06 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:15:41PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Yes. Do you want me to apply it? I can't remember, did I actually have a patch or did you ?? john -- "Mathemeticians stand on each other's shoulders while computer scientists stand on each other's toes." - Richa

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:07:23PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> Well - nothing wrong with 'Command not allowed without any >> document open'. >> >> Except that

Re: 'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-06 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:07:23PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Well - nothing wrong with 'Command not allowed without any document open'. > > Except that it is somewhat unexpected if it is the response to 'Ctrl-L' in > an ERT inset. known bug, I'

'Command not allowed without any document open'

2002-02-06 Thread Andre Poenitz
Well - nothing wrong with 'Command not allowed without any document open'. Except that it is somewhat unexpected if it is the response to 'Ctrl-L' in an ERT inset. Btw: It would be nice if the ERT inset is closed and the cursor put behind the inset... Andr