Re: [LyX master] - language: Kurmanji is since 2009 also supported by babel; no fileformat change necessary because Kurmanji is already covered by fileformat 432 - tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp: babel support

Am 23.06.2012 20:31, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Thanks. I missed that. But I haven't not yet understood exactly what it should look like. How should have been the log for my commit? Add Babel support for Kurmanji Here are some paragraphs that explain the commit... Signed-off-by: Uwe St

Re: [LyX master] - language: Kurmanji is since 2009 also supported by babel; no fileformat change necessary because Kurmanji is already covered by fileformat 432 - tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp: babel support

Op 23-6-2012 20:19, Uwe Stöhr schreef: > See: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/141014 Thanks. I missed that. But I haven't not yet understood exactly what it should look like. How should have been the log for my commit? Add Babel support for Kurmanji Here are some paragra

Re: [LyX master] - language: Kurmanji is since 2009 also supported by babel; no fileformat change necessary because Kurmanji is already covered by fileformat 432 - tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp: babel support

Am 23.06.2012 20:16, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 23-6-2012 20:09, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 23.06.2012 19:47, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please start your commit log with a short (70 characters) summary of all changes. What is going on? What is wrong with my commit logs, sometimes

Re: [LyX master] - language: Kurmanji is since 2009 also supported by babel; no fileformat change necessary because Kurmanji is already covered by fileformat 432 - tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp: babel support

Op 23-6-2012 20:09, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 23.06.2012 19:47, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please start your commit log with a short (70 characters) summary of all changes. What is going on? What is wrong with my commit logs, sometimes you complain they contain less info, sometimes they con

Re: [LyX master] - language: Kurmanji is since 2009 also supported by babel; no fileformat change necessary because Kurmanji is already covered by fileformat 432 - tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp: babel support

Op 23-6-2012 20:09, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 23.06.2012 19:47, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please start your commit log with a short (70 characters) summary of all changes. What is going on? What is wrong with my commit logs, sometimes you complain they contain less info, sometimes they con

Re: [LyX master] - language: Kurmanji is since 2009 also supported by babel; no fileformat change necessary because Kurmanji is already covered by fileformat 432 - tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp: babel support

Am 23.06.2012 19:47, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please start your commit log with a short (70 characters) summary of all changes. What is going on? What is wrong with my commit logs, sometimes you complain they contain less info, sometimes they contain too much. Where do you have the n

Re: [LyX master] - language: Kurmanji is since 2009 also supported by babel; no fileformat change necessary because Kurmanji is already covered by fileformat 432 - tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp: babel support

2009 also supported by babel; no fileformat change necessary because Kurmanji is already covered by fileformat 432 - tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp: babel support for Kurmanji and remove comment residues of ArmTeX whose support was removed by fileformat 433 Please start your commit log with a short

Re: #432 [PATCH]

> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> I don't have a problem with the one char change -- that was my Allan> original fix but upon further consideration (above) I decided Allan> the fix I provided was better (although the one char fix is Allan> probably all we want for 1.2.

Re: #432 [PATCH]

On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > > | Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > | | On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Allan Rae wrote: [...] > InsetIterator is use twice... > > the use in buffer.C:3972 will work fine with >= (even better probab

Re: #432 [PATCH]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | | On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Allan Rae wrote: >> >>> It's not quite as simple as errors after a newline not being removed. >>> Some are, but those in the overly long testcase aren't. I will >>> investigate this

Re: #432 [PATCH]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | | On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Allan Rae wrote: >> >>> It's not quite as simple as errors after a newline not being removed. >>> Some are, but those in the overly long testcase aren't. I will >>> investigate this

Re: #432 [PATCH]

Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Allan Rae wrote: > >> It's not quite as simple as errors after a newline not being removed. >> Some are, but those in the overly long testcase aren't. I will >> investigate this weekend. > | I've figured it out. This change: > | 2002-0

Re: #432 [PATCH]

,3 +1,10 @@ +2002-06-09 Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * paragraph.[hC] (nextInsetIterator): new function + * BufferView2.C (removeAutoInsets): Fix bug #432 which was introduced + when the paragraph iterator algorithms were rewritten. Added and use + a new ite

#432

It's not quite as simple as errors after a newline not being removed. Some are, but those in the overly long testcase aren't. I will investigate this weekend. Allan. (ARRae)