tributions
under BSD or GPL license. Whichever you decide suits you better.
Best regards,
Zvezdan Petkovic
vvy
academic users in USA is that they are buying Apple computers
with Mac OS X more and more. They will not hurt Microsoft any time
soon, but I would say that is a progressive trend.
We may want to support that Mac OS X port with greater care.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
people, at least in USA use it.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ros wouldn't hurt either. :-)
As an aside note, for people who use BibTeX only databases, tkbibtex is
still unbeatable in terms of ease of installation. Just drop it in your
$HOME/bin and add exec permission to it. And it works on Windows too,
since Tcl/Tk is available for all platforms.
engineering and math.
In fact, a few days ago I was asked to resubmit a CV for my job
application in Word. PDF wasn't good enough. :-)
BTW, anyone has a job offer?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:15:52AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 03:32:49PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> > You mentioned scientific community before mentioning Word.
> > I do not know which scientific community you belong to,
> > but I know fo
hinery, offers BibTeX citation for each publication in
the library. No other formats. Why? Because computer scientists use
LaTeX or even troff, not Word. Since BibTeX is richer format than
refer, that makes sense. troff users can convert BibTeX to refer as
already mentioned.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic &
gt; > And instead of ae, I'd recommend latin modern, a much better type-1
> > > version of cm (though still beta and not yet perfect).
> >
> > Which package do you load for this?
>
> \usepackage{lmodern}. See
> http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:48:39AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > If you choose Layout->Document and in the dialogue that opens set Fonts
> > button to "palatino" (or some other non-default), there are no problems
> > with PDF w
PS: Please CC, as I'm not a subscriber to this list.
Well if you expect reply you should subscribe at least for a short time.
This guy explains well why this is not a proper netiquette:
http://www.trumpetpower.com/Rants/Netiquette/
Section: Don't do drive-by postings
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
00 25367000 rlib 1 /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3.12
07ae5000 27aef000 rlib 1 /usr/lib/libpthread.so.2.1
Perhaps you can find something useful in my recent posts about changes I
had to do to compile it for OpenBSD.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdanl
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:24:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Zvezdan> Hello everybody, I've built a port of lyx-1.3.4 for OpenBSD.
> Zvezdan> Here are the fix
make equivalents (notice that they were _not_ used in port, I simply
made it use gmake)
One of the OpenBSD ports committers replied today regarding the make
stuff. Quote:
"You're going overboard here. Just depend on gmake."
I think that settles it. :-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
d dandy.
However, if you can't (which is currently the case) then I think this
"distribution feature" can be really helpful under condition that
configure really respects environment variables. It does respect LIBS,
I do not see any reason not to respect MOC or UIC. Just my 2 cents.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
suppose your patch is OK. It's clearly
> preferable to hardcoding "moc3-mt" as another name to try anyway.
I absolutely agree. Because they may decide tomorrow that it should be
called only moc-mt or moc4-mt. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
remember. Last time I used SysV make was back in 1995.
:-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ocess from scratch (having just run make
> maintainer-clean) and am using DEC/Compaq/HP make to build it. This
> flavour of make does not understand the gnu-isms. Let's see if it
> understands Zvezdan's alternative.
>
> No joy :-(
Because it's System V Rele
.for loop.
That way, both makes will be happy, and you cover rather big user base
(Linux + {Free,Net,Open}BSD).
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
yntax
complicates the parser, which introduces more bugs, blah, blah...
This is just a wild guess, I do not know really.
I just take it as a fact of life. :-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
John,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:11:02AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:45:15PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> >automagically defined. The trouble is that LyX's configure doesn't
> >respect MOC and UIC environment variables and over
while Makefile would work with gmake.
I believe that would be all. Thanks, and keep the good work.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
$OpenBSD$
--- config/qt.m4.orig 2002-12-19 18:41:18.0 -0500
+++ config/qt.m42004-02-2
It's fairly easy to produce multiple rpm binary packages from a single
source rpm. However, having two different executables would require two
compilations during the building of rpms. Also, the executables would
have to be called differently. One of them can be called lyx, the other
perha
Please find attached the xforms.spec file. The changes I did are
described in its changelog.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
%define libname libforms
%define rel release
%define xdirX11R6
Summary: XForms library
Name: xforms
V
ver, I didn't know whether other Linux distributions use the same
place to store .desktop files (on Red Hat it is /etc/X11/applnk), so I
left it out. If you think it can be useful I can send the patch for
that too.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I repeat my question from the last week since nobody bothered to reply.
Why the quote character doesn't get remaped properly?
See the explanation below. This has worked in 1.1.6. It doesn't in
1.2.3 and 1.3.0 (neither xforms nor qt)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:02:52PM -0500, Zvezda
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 11:57:16PM +0100, Jade wrote:
> I have found a package called "jurabib", that can help doing this, but I
> wondered if there was a way to include the package automatically using Lyx.
Did you try putting \usepackege{jurabib} in your LaTeX preamble?
--
ssing " I get quotation signs << >>, instead of
capital C' (C acute).
Where should I start looking for the bug (kbmap.C wasn't too
promising)? This was obviously introduced between 1.1.6 and 1.2.x.
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 02:56:29PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Zvezdan> I also propose a patch to spec file that is attached to
> Zvezdan> enforce use of macros everywh
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:24:10PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 04:50:05AM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:24:17AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 03:53:44PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > >
see if fix4 changes things in
any way.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
o that, but I guess so can anybody else with a
newer version of RH on his machine.
I also propose a patch to spec file that is attached to enforce use of
macros everywhere.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
--- lyx-1.1.6.spec Fri Jan 11 19:31:16 2002
++
dumps), then it is a fair bet that you
> have installed the wrong version of XForms for your machine.
>
> --
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ce rpm because they did not use RPM_BUILD_ROOT. You can pick up the
correct spec file (or rpms for that matter) at:
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/programs/RPMS/LyX/
[The lyx.spec changes from the above page have already been included in
LyX rpms]
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PR
in CVS version anymore.
>
The proper way in LaTeX to enter roman text in math is \mathrm{...}.
That works in LyX math mode too. Simply start typing \ and continue with
the rest. I do not know about CVS version though. Give it a shot...
Cheers,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
tention to use xterms :-)
>
Then put in their .profile (or .bash_profile)
[ -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in ] && rm -f ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
[ -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out ] && rm -f ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
or if they are using (t)csh then in their .login put
if ( -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in ) rm -rf ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
if ( -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out ) rm -rf ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
cluding fonts,
bibtex styles, latex styles, ...
All this is described in the above mentioned teTeX documentation (see
links to FAQ and TeX directory structure.
Hope this puts you on the right path. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Does that mean that DESTDIR takes care of all that through autoconf?
>
> Yes. The DESTDIR is the autoconf (automake really) way of doing
> staging
ee neither that nor something as:
bindir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}.
Does that mean that DESTDIR takes care of all that through autoconf?
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> If using %{_bindir} and %{_datadir} in %files sections and not
> >> passing %{_bindir} and
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:33:21AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mit, 2001-09-19 at 05:23, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> >
> > IMHO, you are exaggerating.
> Well, of cause, I have to disagree :)
>
> Primarily, it's just convenience for users/installers not
uestion:
Who in the right mind would change $prefix/bin and $prefix/share to
something else for any $prefix?
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
t fileutils owns /usr too and doesn't remove it. There are a few KDE
packages that are badly built and claim that they own /usr. We don't
want to be like them, do we?
Kayvan, please stick with the %files section from my spec file. It's
well defined.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:36:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | No, %{_mandir} is just fine since /usr/lib/rpm/i386-linux/macros define
> | _mandir as /usr/share/man just as /etc/man.conf does.
>
> No sing
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 06:39:50AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Die, 2001-09-18 at 02:55, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:15:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Exactly, but on a properly configured system RPM follows /etc/man.conf.
> This is
;
> I guess that %{_prefix}/man must be used in the spec file...
>
> --
> Lgb
No, %{_mandir} is just fine since /usr/lib/rpm/i386-linux/macros define
_mandir as /usr/share/man just as /etc/man.conf does.
It seems to be a standard now since my old computer runs OpenBSD 2.9 and
1/applnk/Applications/lyx.desktop
%{_bindir}/*
%{_mandir}/man?/*
%{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/*
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/texmf/tex/latex/%{name}
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:15:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | However, similar references should be written as:
> |
> | ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_mandir}/man?/*
> |
> | because on some systems it's /us
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:03:38PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> I'm ranting about this for the third time already, but obviously nobody
> wants to take my spec files and make this as it should be.
>
I'm taking this back. I've just seen in another message tha
les and make this as it should be.
[http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/programs/RPMS/LyX/]
Current rpm files do not work well with the latest Linux distros >= 7.x
as explained on the above web page.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
or being arrogant. It's so typical of people from our region. It
was almost as listening to myself. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
gt; everybody else's base 10.
>
> Which would mean that Columbus will cross the Atlantic in about 33 years,
> of course.
>
> And that, in turn, means that the whole discussion English vs American
> pretty senseless for a while...
>
I thought this was ISO vs American discussion.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 12:10:04PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > | However I don
> | of date-formats and output it in the local (prefered language) mode ;)
>
> No, we should use the language of the web page.
>
> --
> Lgb
And that is _ENGLISH_ -- not "American".
And in England people write 3rd August 2001.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:43:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Common Lars.
>
> Hmrppf... are you belittling me? ( :-) )
>
:-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:21:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> | > Output looks like:
> | > Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
> |
&g
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> Output looks like:
> Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
Why not make it according to international standard: 2001-08-03?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ago, and it just continues. For me it really
doesn't matter. Anything UNIX is fine.
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 16-Aug-2001 Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> > That way my rpm shell script is executed when I type rpm ...
> > It adds my rpmrc file, and it adds my macros file. Hence the topdir and
> > tmppath get ch
a from /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.0.2/multiplebuilds (might
be /usr/doc/rpm-xxx/ on another distro).
Hope this helps in your efforts to build RPMs on other distros.
All the best.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
intanance problems. With each
new version of LyX only the version number must be changed, and it
should build and install correctly on any rpm based distro.
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ichael
Well, Kayvan said that he'll incorporate the changes in the RPMs, but I
don't see that happening yet. Perhaps this discussion will prompt him to
do it faster. :-)
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
forms RPMs there too. The one on the LyX
site doesn't use RPM_BUILD_ROOT at all. It goes directly writing into
your /usr/X11R6/lib during the build. So, you have parts of it before
you have installed it. I fixed that and made 0.89 version RPM too, in
case somebody wants it.
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 04:11:26PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2001 16:01, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 03:52:27PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > In the drop down list of possible layouts.
> > >
> > > What&
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 03:52:27PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> In the drop down list of possible layouts.
>
> What's the difference?
>
> Angus
One is used for a short single paragraph quotes. The other for a
multiple paragraph quotations.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <
topic that I still like CM
better than Times. For some reason. But I'd rather not use any of them.
Give me Palatino, Garamond, Minion, etc. -- and, of course, Euler for
math.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ance the art of mathematical type design.
Do you believe me now?
FWIW, The METAFONTbook is dedicated:
To Hermann Zapf
Whose strokes are the best
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:56:38AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Zvezdan> That's exactly what I meant. CM family is ugly. Notice what I
> Zvezdan> say above about Eul
rgue it's adobe that's the main problem here, not
> the technology.
>
I agree. I still like better that some company imposes a good format on
me (like PDF) than a bad format (like doc). :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
fort to make it look
better.
Hence, having a good-looking PDF on screen is an imperative. Hence Type1
fonts. I hope I made my point more clearly now. :-)
Finally, I would agree with you that Metafont is a fine technology, but
Type1 has become de facto standard for printing industry.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
a copy
of that email here:
*
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 10 14:26:29 2001
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:26:29 -0400
From: Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Joris van der Hoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TeXmacs advantages over LyX list
Message-ID: <[EMAI
5, Netscape 4.7 and Mozilla 0.91
>
Yes, the developers pages are in transition. They still use tables
instead of pinmenu.css. They will be done soon as far as I understood
Allan when I asked the same question. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
nly application you won't be
able to compile with 7.0 gcc. It's not a real gcc, it's Red Hat
`creation'. As far as I know, such applications compile with kgcc (and
work!)
Good luck.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ed
gcc in it too (there came an update recently).
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:37:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> | Or maybe provide something else that can reasonably substitute the
> | feature.
>
> KDE,GNOME,CDE,Windown etc...
>
What if I want to use my good ol' 90K small wmx?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic &
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:04:46AM +0200, A.Gulino wrote:
>
> > Finally, what's the look of the pages on www.w3c.org/Style/CSS in your
> > browser?
>
> good, without problems
Allan's previous message explains everything.
Thanks!
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAI
kies: csidebar=0 and clong=0.
That way you get the presentation that is the best.
The purpose of testing is to show which browsers should go to the nocss
list.
I hope this clears out the things.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
default fonts option on?
Switch off that option. Switch on CSS. Try it again. If it doesn't work
update your Netscape to 4.77. It's free. It's recommended because all
updates were _security_ advisories.
Finally, what's the look of the pages on www.w3c.org/Style/CSS in your
browser?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
st of you like it, it shouldn't be difficult to fix lyx.css. Very
small change. And now, when we do not have tables any more, it shouldn't
create the "black parts problem in Netscape" as it did before. That was
the benefit of switching to s.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ou'll see
the real effect of pinned menu. It stays in the top left corner while
the text scrolls by. And you'll be able to see the source.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
the source.
>
Martin, thanks for pointing this out to him. It's much easier than CVS
in my opinion.
FWIW, I wrote pinmenu.css.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
There's absolutely _NO_ JavaScript there. Just Netscape is so stupid
that it can't show CSS unless JavaScript is on. It looks the same as if
CSS is switched off. That's Netscape bug. I just checked in Konqueror
and Mozilla with JavaScript off. Works quite fine.
--
Zvezdan P
s inferior compared to more modern
browsers (because the menu scrolls with the page, while in other
browser it stays pinned down at the top left corner).
Ah, well...
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
sage, I hope you
understand that the best solution is an upgrade of KDE. The latest
Konqueror (and all other browsers from the list) doesn't have any
problems with LyX pages. I believe this is not the only page you have
trouble seeing in that version of Konqueror (as far as I remember it).
Be
would return spacing to default. Now you see why CSS is so Good
Thing (TM). If most of the people wants the regular spacing it's an easy
fix.
No, I didn't write that rule. :-) I wouldn't mind the regular spacing.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
2.1.1.
It would be really difficult (if possible at all) to make this work in a
discontinued version of Konqueror, and I hope you'll agree that it's not
that important considering the number of users of that version.
I also hope you won't take this as a lame excuse.
Best rega
ain images) destroys the "centredness" of
. There are some indications in CSS specification that table body
element's presentation should be defined in CSS. I'm not sure whether
Netscape will like it. I'll play with this these days. Definitely not a
pressing issue.
2; is an em
dash in case you want it there). Just an idea to ponder. As I said it's
not important.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
The second is a real workaround, and it's not clear
to me how this can validate (and it does).
And yes, _NO OTHER BROWSER_, including the lame Netscape 4.x, had any
problems with parsing:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; lang="en" xml:lang="en">
Microsoft, should I say more...
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
Konqueror, Mozilla, Netscape, Lynx
and IE). Commit the changes.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
/*
* Pinned menu CSS
*
* Borrowed from the idea of Bert Bos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> published at:
* http://www.w3.org/Style/
9%" and not 100% -- those browser
differences :-(
You might want to make this one "position: fixed" too, but be warned
that you might need a after because Mozilla hides the
title below the menu.
Cheers,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.e
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 02:54:21PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 08:26:34PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >
> > in Netscape 4.77 without css the menu is above the text.
> >
>
> And it should be. In Lynx it looks exactly like that. In such ca
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 08:26:34PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> in Netscape 4.77 without css the menu is above the text.
>
And it should be. In Lynx it looks exactly like that. In such cases top
navigation should be switched on.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http:
t; xml:lang="en">
What remains to be done:
Did you ever see top navbar in Konqueror. If not you are spared of big
surprise. It takes a whole page in height and two pages in width. I do
not know why, but I'm working now on fixing it in a manner.
I'll be back as soon as I do that.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
I have nearly all LDNs rendering okay and completely valid
> XHTML now as well. If it weren't for that stupid Netscape rendering bug
> or at least the weirdness with the sidebar I'd commit these changes to cvs
> so we could enjoy some really sexy web pages.
>
> Allan. (ARRae)
>
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 04:31:23PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> Aren't you supposed to be able to do for
> multiple inheritance?
>
Something similar I suppose, but it never
worked in Netscape 4.x, so I never use it. One usually can achieve the
same with:
--
Mozilla and right aligned menu. Fixing
width fixed it. I tested again in Mozilla, Netscape, and Konqueror.
Let's wait Allan's reply to decide about moving the menu to the left
corner. I'm for it.
Cheers,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ld do is "top: 1em" in the div.pinmenu class. It's
currently 10em to be in approximately same place as before. 1em would
pin it in the upper left corner. It can also be changed to go to the
right corner if you want.
Tell me what you think.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
urrently have with Netscape 4 understanding of CSS. I
struggled for a while with this, probably a year ago, and decided to go
with a solid colour. Some of my pages have light background (Navajo
White [rather sandy colour]) and some have dark background (Indigo blue)
and white text. Much less CS
nd at the
end instead of "ch" sound. Well, ...
I'll post tomorrow if I find the solution for table background problem.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
and you'll get the colour. Simple rule:
Don't leave any text outside of some block element (usually )
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
