On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 14:11 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Dear root, I don't seem to be able to change the status of a bug
> John> from UNCONFIRMED to ASSIGNED (even though as frontend-gtk it was
> John> already assigned to me) - can I have the permissions necessary
> John> to do so?
>
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 15:29 +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> I disagree a bit. Being able to open a file at the last position is not
> session management IMHO. session management is "recreate the exact same
> state as LyX was in before shutdown", and it should be implemented using
> the qt/gtk API.
Do y
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 15:39 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Comments? I'd like to apply it for 1.4.1. Then of course we'll have to
> fix the actual problem.
Looking at your qt2 patch, it doesn't seem like you're handling the case
where the use selects a different document class then goes stra
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 16:16 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > I may have missed this, but do you have an external boost installed?
> >
> > No. Should I?
>
> If I understood the bug report correctly, having precompiled headers
> there could cause this. Apparently not.
Any news on this problem?
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:10 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
> indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
> the ChangeLog files anymore.
>
> IMHO we should rather put that information in the log message on the
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 11:33 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Georg> Indeed. Sometimes one is just routine-blinded (is this
> Georg> understandable? In german we call it "betriebsblind").
>
> That's understandable, but I cannot find the right english (or french)
> version...
"Can't see the fo
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 16:32 +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> glibmm-ERROR **: file objectbase.cc: line 77 (void
> Glib::ObjectBase::initialize(GObject*)): assertion failed: (gobject_ ==
> castitem)
> aborting...
> I'm not sure I have gtkmm and everything installed properly, though.
Problems
I can't reproduce this, although I see you're using gcc 3.4.5, whereas
I'm using 4.0. This appears to be related to the signal handling in the
GtkLengthEntry class, although I can't see that it's doing anything
wrong.
What happens if you comment out lines 125 and 126 of GGraphics.C, thus
removin
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:35 +, John C. Spray wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:23 -0500, Richard Kleeman wrote:
> > The gtk is considerably worse and very sluggish indeed with cpu usage
> > around 99% with or without previewing and also the cpu usage does not
> > drop wh
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:23 -0500, Richard Kleeman wrote:
> The gtk is considerably worse and very sluggish indeed with cpu usage
> around 99% with or without previewing and also the cpu usage does not
> drop when you stop scrolling as the qt frontend did.
The "cpu-hogging when doing nothing" pr
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 18:00 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Also we don't get commit messages on the CVS list (I think John
> committed something).
Hmmm? I'm getting messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject lines like
"r13226 - in /lyx-devel/trunk/lib/lyx2lyx: ChangeLog LyX.p..."
"[Cvslog] r132
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Please post an answer to this mail if you would like me to enable your
write access.
Me, please.
John
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 15:27 +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > 2. When bibtopic is enabled, the checkbutton should be disabled
>
> This one. However, it does not really harm if we send
> setOptions("bibtotoc"), since bibtopic disables the headings of the
> bibliography completely. You are forc
Hi,
As you may be able to guess, I'm implementing the GTK Bibtex dialog. In
the update() code in the existing frontends, the "Show bibliography in
TOC" check button is to be inactive if usinggBibTopic() is true.
However, we still send back a setOptions("bibtotoc"); on apply().
The result is that
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 13:28 +, John Levon wrote:
> The context-sensitive toolbars can be very distracting. /Especially/ if
> they're at the top: this means your document jumps around vertically
> when you move the cursor. Not a good idea!
I agree - context-sensitive toolbars should appear and
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 15:36 +0100, Frederic-Emmanuel PICCA wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 03:05:42PM +0100, Leuven, E. wrote:
> >>* the icons are extremely ugly (and very inconsistent in style)
> > We badly need an artist on staff.
>
> What about using the same icones than
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:47 +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> BTW, could somebody tell me what' s wrong with Gtk::Combo? Sometimes it
> just won't display its model's entries at all -- that's one reason why I
> moved on to ComboBoxText, though at first I didn't feel like creating a
> widget manually,
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 12:16 +0100, Frederic-Emmanuel PICCA wrote:
> Ha ok :)
> so it would be nice to pop up a windows with non already implemented :)
The idea is to soon (er, probably Sunday, I am living in interesting
times) put in some stubs for the unfinished dialogs, so that they can be
worke
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 16:21 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> I've also attached a patch to configure.ac
> John> (noxforms-config.patch) that someone else will need to review
> John> and apply. It removes the automatic adding of xforms to the
> John> frontends list when gtk is selected.
>
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 14:45 +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> New year, new dialogs! Comments highly requested.
You seem to have forgotten to send the .glade file! Judging from the
screenshots I'll make a few tweaks to the widget spacing for you (being
a GNOME HIG fascist), but apart from that look
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 14:45 +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> And what exactly is happening to "Preamble"? It has been marked as
> "pending" for several months and there is no code in CVS, though it
> looks not too complicated...
The preamble is pending because it's going to be part of the Document
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 22:43 +0100, Martin Dietz wrote:
> I attach the log. It seems there is some problem with the xft fonts. I tried
> installing the latex-xftfonts and several other font packages wihout
> success.
See:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg82989.html
And the wor
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 08:24 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > The idea is that each frontend author is free to implement the dialogs
> > as he wants. There is no contraint on their layout and/or text.
>
> But that's a bug, not a feature, right? We _should_ strive for uniformity.
I disagree. Altho
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 10:55 -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Have you got appropriate screen fonts installed
> (http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/Qt)?
That's sorted it, thanks.
John
Hello,
Just built LyX from CVS on FC4, and am getting erroneous characters in
math: I write "\approx" and I get a kind of bottom-half-of-an-ellipse
instead of a wiggly equals sign. The character comes out correctly in
the postscript output though.
John
25 matches
Mail list logo
