Re: Lyx -> LaTeX backward (IN-)compaitbilty

2006-08-13 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Aug 13, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Am Sonntag, 13. August 2006 19:05 schrieb Jens Noeckel: On Aug 13, 2006, at 2:16 AM, Georg Baum wrote: The text above refers to the LyX->LaTeX->LyX roundtrip. The LaTeX->LyX->LaTeX roundtrip has no dataloss because of suffi

Re: Lyx -> LaTeX backward (IN-)compaitbilty

2006-08-13 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Aug 13, 2006, at 2:16 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Am Sonntag, 13. August 2006 08:42 schrieb Jens Noeckel: All this will become less important once LyX is more scriptable, but for now being part of the export menu seems to make such a function much easier to use. I personally will just use a

Re: Lyx -> LaTeX backward (IN-)compaitbilty

2006-08-12 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:20 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Am Samstag, 12. August 2006 14:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Rather than adding yet other export formats that clutter the interface, could we have a buffer-export-raw lfun? It could have some option to skip header. I think that would work as

Re: Lyx -> LaTeX backward (IN-)compaitbilty

2006-08-11 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Jens" == Jens Noeckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jens> From the previous messages in this thread it's clear to me that Jens> there's no remaining argument against restoring that simple Jens> op

Re: Lyx -> LaTeX backward (IN-)compaitbilty

2006-08-11 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Aug 11, 2006, at 5:25 AM, Helge Hafting wrote: Georg Baum wrote: Jens Noeckel wrote: The simple answer is: I'd like to see backwards compatibility restored, because if you want to take lyx seriously as a command- line tool AS WELL AS a GUI application, you have to expect that

Re: Lyx -> LaTeX backward (IN-)compaitbilty

2006-08-10 Thread Jens Noeckel
I've just added another (and not reported earlier, I believe) bug related to the latex export, when done from the command line. It causes irreversible loss of existing EPS files. I'm not saying that it's useless to have such an additional functionality, but I think given the pros and cons

Re: Lyx -> LaTeX backward (IN-)compaitbilty

2006-08-10 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Aug 10, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:28:31AM -0700, Jens Noeckel wrote: On Aug 10, 2006, at 6:25 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Jens Noeckel wrote: I had brought up an issue on the LyX users list, see the quoted text below; meanwhile I've l

Re: Lyx -> LaTeX backward (IN-)compaitbilty

2006-08-10 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Aug 10, 2006, at 6:25 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Jens Noeckel wrote: I had brought up an issue on the LyX users list, see the quoted text below; meanwhile I've looked around for some more info on this, and felt I could make some suggestions here. Looking at Bug 2419, I see the rational

Lyx -> LaTeX backward (IN-)compaitbilty

2006-08-09 Thread Jens Noeckel
Hi , I had brought up an issue on the LyX users list, see the quoted text below; meanwhile I've looked around for some more info on this, and felt I could make some suggestions here. Looking at Bug 2419, I see the rationale for having self-contained export from LyX to LaTeX that includes t

Re: Tweaking lyxrc.dist for MacOS X

2006-08-01 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Aug 1, 2006, at 8:07 AM, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jul 28, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: Hi, I've got some small suggestions for the LyX-Mac version of lyxrc.dist in the LyX 1.4.2 Application bundle. Prompted by a problem with imagemagick's convert utility (whic

Re: Lyx Menu under LyX-Mac [was; LyX 1.4.2 on Intel]

2006-07-28 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 27, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Jens Noeckel wrote: On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:38 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Jens Noeckel wrote: These GUI hacks are not at all transparent to me, so I think someone else (maybe Georg or JMarc) should have a look at this. Apart from the LyX menu, everything else works

Tweaking lyxrc.dist for MacOS X

2006-07-28 Thread Jens Noeckel
Hi, I've got some small suggestions for the LyX-Mac version of lyxrc.dist in the LyX 1.4.2 Application bundle. Prompted by a problem with imagemagick's convert utility (which wasn't working out of the box for me), Bennett told me that the definition of PATH had changed from what it was in

Re: Lyx Menu under LyX-Mac [was; LyX 1.4.2 on Intel]

2006-07-27 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:38 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Jens Noeckel wrote: These GUI hacks are not at all transparent to me, so I think someone else (maybe Georg or JMarc) should have a look at this. Apart from the LyX menu, everything else works perfectly (as far as I can tell). I don't kn

LyX Mac Intel installation

2006-07-26 Thread Jens Noeckel
Hi, compiling LyX 1.4.2 on Mac Intel yesterday, I encountered one little snag which is worth pointing out - the version of automake required by autogen.sh was not in /usr/bin. It's very simple to fix, but I want to write it out clearly. Here is what I have: % /usr/bin/automake --version au

Lyx Menu under LyX-Mac [was; LyX 1.4.2 on Intel]

2006-07-26 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 26, 2006, at 12:13 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Jens Noeckel wrote: Hi, with the help of Bennett's install instructions, I compiled LyX 1.4.2 on my Intel Mac using gcc 4.0 and Qt 3.3.6. Great. When the problems are resolved it would be very nice if you couild provide an installe

Re: LyX 1.4.2 on Intel

2006-07-26 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:39 AM, Bo Peng wrote: On 7/26/06, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now I tried to compile Lars's unicode branch on Mac but found out there are > some configure (scons) quirks: > * it didn't set HAVE_MKSTEMP and some oth

LyX 1.4.2 on Intel

2006-07-25 Thread Jens Noeckel
Hi, with the help of Bennett's install instructions, I compiled LyX 1.4.2 on my Intel Mac using gcc 4.0 and Qt 3.3.6. However, while testing the Application, I noticed a problem with the menus and keyboard shortcuts that seems to be identical to what has been reported by A.S.Hodel in this