On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:27:12 -0800 (PST)
>>>>>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Acuña wrote:
Marcelo> My excuses by the false alarm. I am very ashamed for that reason.
No problem. It happens to everyone...we are just curios what has
happened with your cat? ;)
Sincerel
tion. It was trying to read the error
Marcelo> message when I noticed that the computer was hung. I reset it
Marcelo> and now, during the starting, shows an error as if it did not
Marcelo> have installed operating system. I have debian lenny 5.0.5,
Marcelo> for amd64.
Did it eat y
hat was clear enough as well.
Now I wonder what will happen with XeTeX since LuaTeX is supposed to
replace or rather become new PDFTeX and will handle Unicode as well?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ly do not understand what problem would XML format in LyX
solve? (YAGNI)
Otoh, just enter 'XML sucks' in Google and you will have some nice
reading. :-)
OT: Can someone explain me what is the aim of latex-3 development in
the light of LuaTeX or LuaTeX will be just another
In case of segfaults, should I send backtraces here or to bugzilla?
Sincerely,
Gour
an not expect that all the present LaTeX limitations of
> utf8 encoded files will go away.
That's why we have XeTeX ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 11:41 +0100, Gour wrote:
> I pulled the code from svn and will try to build it to see how well can
> LyX play with XeTeX...both Kile & Texmaker work with utf-8 so it will be
> pity if LyX is lacking proper support...
Ahh, some problems with my keyboard :-)
pitty if LyX is lacking proper support...
Sincerely,
Gour
der Mark code, or by null high-order
bytes in the initial 16-bit code units). Either way, the input is
assumed to be valid Unicode.
So, by getting LyX work with Unicode in utf-8, we will get XETEX support
as well :-)
However, no fun for LyX-1.4.x
Sincerely,
Gour
/pipermail/xetex/2006-October/005319.html
But, I'll try to build XeTeX and Gentoo and see how it goes.
Sincerely,
Gour
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
i-platform support.
However, I see that XeTeX uses utf-16 encoding internally, while
upcoming LyX, afaik, settled on utf-8, so I wonder what is the prospect
of future LyX-1.5 to handle XeTeX engine?
Sincerely,
Gour
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
'm guilty of featuritis myself.
That was my idea expressed in the post "LyX & front-ends" to clean the
code so it can be put in a library with the clean API, but considering
there was no any reply so far, I wonder whether the task is not an easy,
one, idea is dumb, or ...?
Sincer
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What is your version og gtkmm? The code seems to look explicitely for
> 2.4, isn't it?
Huh, I have 2.8.1.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
gs: -I${includedir}/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
Here I have:
Cflags: -I${includedir}/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
-I/usr/include/freetype2/config
afaics, it should work, but it doesn't.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
hat.
That would be good.
Sincerely,
Gour
>
> JMarc
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
e same error,
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
r--1 root root 2161 Mar 23 2005 ftxpost.h
-rw-r--r--1 root root 23446 Mar 23 2005 ftxsbit.h
-rw-r--r--1 root root 3462 Mar 23 2005 ftxwidth.h
So, what is the proper way to include the ../freetype2 header dir?
Does the gtk front-end needs freetype1 or freetype2?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
ussion.
Thank you for your input.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
l to bring LyX (almost automatically) to three main platforms:
Linux, Mac & Win32, instead of having devlopers working on each port separately
- saving the developer time.
Besides that, wxWidgets seems more stable than GTK on win32 and give native
widgets, and gives, imho, enough bells &a
ur efforts and providing present LyX (which is enough for me :-)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
ndependence territory, can we say that some
toolkit is 'more natural'?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
ething wrong with wxWidgets.
Unfortunately I'm not qualified to do that, but maybe someone will apper to take
a challenge.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
.
Thank you for this info.
Is there any reason why wxWidgets toolkit is (somehow) avoided?
It's not that I'm pushing it, but, imho, it looks like a mature multi-platform
toolkit with a fair licence.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User
t?
Is it a big task considering the present status of LyX's GUI-independence?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
pgpHd0VcBqeDq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
24 matches
Mail list logo
