-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 23:21, Dan Armak wrote:
> OK, I'll look at the problematic chars tomorrow. With any luck they will
have
> a single cause of failure and I will find it :-)
It looks like there's some problem in pfaedit, the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 23:06, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:56:24PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
>
> > Hmm. Looking at it, it provides the mapping of the orig bluesky type1
fonts,
> > not that of the bakoma ones.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 March 2003 19:32, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:30:26PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
>
> > 1) exists in cmmi10 (both bakoma and bluesky-derived versions). So
apparently
> > lyx isn't using that fon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 March 2003 19:30, Dan Armak wrote:
> How that name got there, I've no idea, since it is called "kappa" in the
> original bluesky type1 font, so either my generating scripts or pfaedit
> itself are at fault..
fault...
I'll try to fix this - there's a whole bunch of characters around kappa in
msbm10 that have the wrong names (the names of the unicode chars that should
be at their address). Meanwhile a quick explanation of when lyx uses unicode
values, and when it uses character names, would be
ut in anything that doesn't exist in the bakoma package, because I
wouldn't know what unicode values to give the chars.
- --
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Matan, Israel
Public GPG key: http://www.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
-BEGIN PGP SIG
wants them. If it doesn't...
- --
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Matan, Israel
Public GPG key: http://www.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+iGV5UI2RQ41fiVERAoyqAJ9rjDekStSTa44f//HWa0zAQzvvhwCfaszP
/2DB6if/o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 29 March 2003 20:09, Dan Armak wrote:
> If I'm right, it is caused by encoding info problems. The bakoma fonts, for
> reference, are encoded as "ISO 10646-1 (Unicode, BMP)" (according to
pfaedit)
> and have the
type1 to truetype, the encoding
seems to have been changed from 'custom' to the unicode definition, don't
know if that's important), so any suggestions would be more than welcome.
- --
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Matan, Israel
Public GPG key: http://w
ecessary. Thanks !
Bye.
Aborted
No time to do more testing right now, but it does happen.
- --
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Matan, Israel
Public GPG key: http://www.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DB
1:41, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:33:33PM +0200, Dan Armak wrote:
>
> > qt 3.1.0. lyx 1.3.0. I haven't had time to try lyx cvs yet (and qt 3.1.1/2
has
>
> Please do, it has different code I think ...
>
> john
>
- --
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux develope
qstr(font.rawName()) << endl;
I'll try lyx 1.3.x cvs now, with this change. Fetching lyx cvs...
- --
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Matan, Israel
Public GPG key: http://www.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linu
me figure out why it finds cmr10 but not cmmi10.
fc-list displays it correctly. So does the font list in qtconfig. I even
tried substituting cmr10 for cmmi10 in qtconfig - nothing happened. Weird.
Does anyone know what's behind this? What should I do to debug this further?
- --
Dan Arm
13 matches
Mail list logo