Apologies due. Since Lyx no longer compiles under my native C++ compiler
I cannot distinguish between Lyx requiring gcc tools such as assemblers
and linkers and gcc requiring them. Given Lyx's passed independence of
"gccisms" I am happy to accept that my use of g++ has produced cascading
gnu depend
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Could you tell us more about specific errors that you get? I do
> compile with gcc 2.95.2 on linux.
That is good to hear.
std::basic_string and std::numeric_limits are missing (possibly more - I
did not get past the latter). The former appeared to be in the include
Kim,
I saw similar behaviour with Solaris 2.6 and gcc-2.95.2 when compiling
the previous version of Lyx (it is in lyx-bugzilla somewhere). I am
afraid that Lyx seems to have gone rather gnu-centric and you can no
longer use the native assembler. I installed gas (the gnu assembler) and
this solved
Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> A.P.Manners wrote:
>
> > Lyx 1.3.0 appears to be unbuildable on Solaris 2.6 because of boost.
> > Others seem to be reporting problems with boost on Solaris 2.6 although,
> > cursiously, not the same problems as I am experiencing. Is th
Lyx 1.3.0 appears to be unbuildable on Solaris 2.6 because of boost.
Others seem to be reporting problems with boost on Solaris 2.6 although,
cursiously, not the same problems as I am experiencing. Is there a known
work around?
I have had problems sending this to bugzilla and so am posting it here.
SYSTEM: Solaris 2.6, gcc 2.95.2, binutils-2.11
(1) Mathed: Native assembler fails
-
Making all in mathed
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home1/pub/lyx-1.2.3/src/mathed'
source='math_sup
Lyx,
Apologies if this is not the correct place for bugs.
Lyx 1.0.1 failed to make on Solaris 2.6 for the following reason:
po/pt.po has several entries with no space between the word 'msgstr'
and the first quote.
i.e. msgstr"IM|Ff#f#F" instead of msgstr "IM|Ff#f#F"
There were a
Thanks for the advice, M-c b is just what I needed for bold in
equations.
I have downloaded the pre4 version of 1 and can see that things are
happening with labels and related items but failed to work out exactly
what. So here is what I would like to do and why but please feel free to
damn me for
Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>
> > equation, since part of it becomes invisible, and doesn't wrap. This
> > would be
> > cured with WYSIWYG boldface inside equations - a nice Xmas present for
> > users.
As a writer of vectors I would strongly support the request for C-b to
work in equations. What lyx o
Ben,
Ben Cazzolato wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 1998, A.P.Manners wrote:
> >
> > Is there a limit of 18 figure floats? Adding the 19th generates strange
> > latex error messages about missing numbers. It happened first when I was
> > writing a report but an empty docume
Lyx users,
Is there a limit of 18 figure floats? Adding the 19th generates strange
latex error messages about missing numbers. It happened first when I was
writing a report but an empty document with 18 figures does the same
thing on the 19th.
I have tried both 0.12.0 and the pre 1.0 version and
11 matches
Mail list logo
